TY - JOUR
T1 - Predictors of hospital readmission after stroke
T2 - A systematic review
AU - Lichtman, Judith H.
AU - Leifheit-Limson, Erica C.
AU - Jones, Sara B.
AU - Watanabe, Emi
AU - Bernheim, Susannah M.
AU - Phipps, Michael S.
AU - Bhat, Kanchana R.
AU - Savage, Shantal V.
AU - Goldstein, Larry B.
PY - 2010/11
Y1 - 2010/11
N2 - Background and Purpose: Risk-standardized hospital readmission rates are used as publicly reported measures reflecting quality of care. Valid risk-standardized models adjust for differences in patient-level factors across hospitals. We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature to identify models that compare hospital-level poststroke readmission rates, evaluate patient-level risk scores predicting readmission, or describe patient and process-of-care predictors of readmission after stroke. Methods: Relevant studies in English published from January 1989 to July 2010 were identified using MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, and all Ovid Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews. Authors of eligible publications reported readmission within 1 year after stroke hospitalization and identified 1 predictors of readmission in risk-adjusted statistical models. Publications were excluded if they lacked primary data or quantitative outcomes, reported only composite outcomes, or had <100 patients. Results: Of 374 identified publications, 16 met the inclusion criteria for this review. No model was specifically designed to compare risk-adjusted readmission rates at the hospital level or calculate scores predicting a patient's risk of readmission. The studies providing multivariable models of patient-level and/or process-of-care factors associated with readmission varied in stroke definitions, data sources, outcomes (all-cause and/or stroke-related readmission), durations of follow-up, and model covariates. Few characteristics were consistently associated with readmission. Conclusions: This review identified no risk-standardized models for comparing hospital readmission performance or predicting readmission risk after stroke. Patient-level and system-level factors associated with readmission were inconsistent across studies. The current literature provides little guidance for the development of risk-standardized models suitable for the public reporting of hospital-level stroke readmission performance.
AB - Background and Purpose: Risk-standardized hospital readmission rates are used as publicly reported measures reflecting quality of care. Valid risk-standardized models adjust for differences in patient-level factors across hospitals. We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature to identify models that compare hospital-level poststroke readmission rates, evaluate patient-level risk scores predicting readmission, or describe patient and process-of-care predictors of readmission after stroke. Methods: Relevant studies in English published from January 1989 to July 2010 were identified using MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, and all Ovid Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews. Authors of eligible publications reported readmission within 1 year after stroke hospitalization and identified 1 predictors of readmission in risk-adjusted statistical models. Publications were excluded if they lacked primary data or quantitative outcomes, reported only composite outcomes, or had <100 patients. Results: Of 374 identified publications, 16 met the inclusion criteria for this review. No model was specifically designed to compare risk-adjusted readmission rates at the hospital level or calculate scores predicting a patient's risk of readmission. The studies providing multivariable models of patient-level and/or process-of-care factors associated with readmission varied in stroke definitions, data sources, outcomes (all-cause and/or stroke-related readmission), durations of follow-up, and model covariates. Few characteristics were consistently associated with readmission. Conclusions: This review identified no risk-standardized models for comparing hospital readmission performance or predicting readmission risk after stroke. Patient-level and system-level factors associated with readmission were inconsistent across studies. The current literature provides little guidance for the development of risk-standardized models suitable for the public reporting of hospital-level stroke readmission performance.
KW - Ischemic stroke
KW - models
KW - outcomes
KW - readmission
KW - systematic review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78149357883&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78149357883&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.599159
DO - 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.599159
M3 - Article
C2 - 20930150
AN - SCOPUS:78149357883
SN - 0039-2499
VL - 41
SP - 2525
EP - 2533
JO - Stroke
JF - Stroke
IS - 11
ER -