TY - JOUR
T1 - Preemptive, but not reactive, spinal cord stimulation mitigates transient ischemia-induced myocardial infarction via cardiac adrenergic neurons
AU - Southerland, E. M.
AU - Milhorn, D. M.
AU - Foreman, R. D.
AU - Linderoth, B.
AU - DeJongste, M. J.L.
AU - Armour, J. A.
AU - Subramanian, V.
AU - Singh, M.
AU - Singh, K.
AU - Ardell, J. L.
PY - 2007/1
Y1 - 2007/1
N2 - Our objective was to determine whether electrical neuromodulation using spinal cord stimulation (SCS) mitigates transient ischemia-induced ventricular infarction and, if so, whether adrenergic neurons are involved in such cardioprotection. The hearts of anesthetized rabbits, subjected to 30 min of left anterior descending coronary arterial occlusion (CAO) followed by 3 h of reperfusion (control), were compared with those with preemptive SCS (starting 15 min before and continuing throughout the 30-min CAO) or reactive SCS (started at 1 or 28 min of CAO). For SCS, the dorsal C8-T2 segments of the spinal cord were stimulated electrically (50 Hz, 0.2 ms, 90% of motor threshold). For preemptive SCS, separate groups of animals were pretreated 15 min before SCS onset with 1) vehicle, 2) prazosin (α1-adrenoceptor blockade), or 3) timolol (β-adrenoceptor blockade). Infarct size (IS), measured with tetrazolium, was expressed as a percentage of risk zone. In controls exposed to 30 min of CAO, IS was 36.4 ± 9.5% (SD). Preemptive SCS reduced IS to 21.8 ± 6.8% (P < 0.001). Preemptive SCS-mediated infarct reduction was eliminated by prazosin (36.6 ± 8.8%) and blunted by timolol (29.4 ± 7.5%). Reactive SCS did not reduce IS. SCS increased phosphorylation of cardiac PKC. SCS did not alter blood pressure or heart rate. We conclude that preemptive SCS reduces the size of infarcts induced by transient CAO; such cardioprotection involves cardiac adrenergic neurons.
AB - Our objective was to determine whether electrical neuromodulation using spinal cord stimulation (SCS) mitigates transient ischemia-induced ventricular infarction and, if so, whether adrenergic neurons are involved in such cardioprotection. The hearts of anesthetized rabbits, subjected to 30 min of left anterior descending coronary arterial occlusion (CAO) followed by 3 h of reperfusion (control), were compared with those with preemptive SCS (starting 15 min before and continuing throughout the 30-min CAO) or reactive SCS (started at 1 or 28 min of CAO). For SCS, the dorsal C8-T2 segments of the spinal cord were stimulated electrically (50 Hz, 0.2 ms, 90% of motor threshold). For preemptive SCS, separate groups of animals were pretreated 15 min before SCS onset with 1) vehicle, 2) prazosin (α1-adrenoceptor blockade), or 3) timolol (β-adrenoceptor blockade). Infarct size (IS), measured with tetrazolium, was expressed as a percentage of risk zone. In controls exposed to 30 min of CAO, IS was 36.4 ± 9.5% (SD). Preemptive SCS reduced IS to 21.8 ± 6.8% (P < 0.001). Preemptive SCS-mediated infarct reduction was eliminated by prazosin (36.6 ± 8.8%) and blunted by timolol (29.4 ± 7.5%). Reactive SCS did not reduce IS. SCS increased phosphorylation of cardiac PKC. SCS did not alter blood pressure or heart rate. We conclude that preemptive SCS reduces the size of infarcts induced by transient CAO; such cardioprotection involves cardiac adrenergic neurons.
KW - Neuromodulation
KW - Ventricular infarction
KW - α-adrenoceptor
KW - β-adrenoceptor
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846215593&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846215593&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1152/ajpheart.00087.2006
DO - 10.1152/ajpheart.00087.2006
M3 - Article
C2 - 16920800
AN - SCOPUS:33846215593
VL - 292
SP - H311-H317
IS - 1
ER -