TY - JOUR
T1 - Preventable mortality
T2 - Does the perspective matter when determining preventability?
AU - Gupta, Meera
AU - Fuchs, Barry
AU - Cutilli, Carolyn
AU - Cintolo, Jessica
AU - Reinke, Caroline
AU - Kean, Craig
AU - Fishman, Neil
AU - Sullivan, Patricia
AU - Kelz, Rachel R.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Background: We report a novel approach to mortality review using a 360° survey and a multidisciplinary mortality committee (MMC) to optimize efforts to improve inpatient care. Methods: In 2009, a 16-item, 360° compulsory quality improvement survey was implemented for mortality review. Descriptive statistics were performed to compare the responses by provider specialty, profession, and level of training using the Fisher exact and chi-square tests, as appropriate.Wecompared the agreement between theMMC review and provider-reported classification regarding the preventability of each death using the Cohen kappa coefficient. A qualitative review of 360° information was performed to identify the quality opportunities. Results: Completed surveys (n = 3095) were submitted for 1683 patients. The possibility of a preventable death was suggested in the 360° survey for 42 patients (1.40%). We identified 502 patients (29.83%) with completed 360° surveys who underwent MMC review. The interrater reliability between the provider opinions regarding preventable death and the MMC review was poor (kappa = 0.10, P < 0.001). Of the 42 cases identified by the 360° survey as preventable deaths, 15 underwent MMC review; 3 were classified as preventable and 12 were deemed unavoidable. Qualitative analyses of the 12 discrepancies did reveal quality issues; however, they were not deemed responsible for the patients' death. Conclusions: The mortality survey yielded important information regarding inpatient deaths that historically was buried with the patient. Poor agreement between the 360° survey responses and an objective MMC review support the need to have a multipronged approach to evaluating inpatient mortality.
AB - Background: We report a novel approach to mortality review using a 360° survey and a multidisciplinary mortality committee (MMC) to optimize efforts to improve inpatient care. Methods: In 2009, a 16-item, 360° compulsory quality improvement survey was implemented for mortality review. Descriptive statistics were performed to compare the responses by provider specialty, profession, and level of training using the Fisher exact and chi-square tests, as appropriate.Wecompared the agreement between theMMC review and provider-reported classification regarding the preventability of each death using the Cohen kappa coefficient. A qualitative review of 360° information was performed to identify the quality opportunities. Results: Completed surveys (n = 3095) were submitted for 1683 patients. The possibility of a preventable death was suggested in the 360° survey for 42 patients (1.40%). We identified 502 patients (29.83%) with completed 360° surveys who underwent MMC review. The interrater reliability between the provider opinions regarding preventable death and the MMC review was poor (kappa = 0.10, P < 0.001). Of the 42 cases identified by the 360° survey as preventable deaths, 15 underwent MMC review; 3 were classified as preventable and 12 were deemed unavoidable. Qualitative analyses of the 12 discrepancies did reveal quality issues; however, they were not deemed responsible for the patients' death. Conclusions: The mortality survey yielded important information regarding inpatient deaths that historically was buried with the patient. Poor agreement between the 360° survey responses and an objective MMC review support the need to have a multipronged approach to evaluating inpatient mortality.
KW - 360° survey
KW - Mortality review process
KW - Multidisciplinary mortality review
KW - Preventable mortality
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884670040&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884670040&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2013.05.069
DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2013.05.069
M3 - Article
C2 - 23773717
AN - SCOPUS:84884670040
SN - 0022-4804
VL - 184
SP - 54
EP - 60
JO - Journal of Surgical Research
JF - Journal of Surgical Research
IS - 1
ER -