TY - JOUR
T1 - Primary versus secondary prevention messages
T2 - College students' perceptions of effectiveness by marijuana user status
AU - Wotring, Amy
AU - Paprzycki, Peter
AU - Wagner-Green, Victoria
AU - Wygonik, Quri R.
AU - Blavos, Alexis A.
AU - Kruger, Jessica
AU - Castor, Tom
AU - Diehr, Aaron J.
AU - Glassman, Tavis J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, © 2018 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2019/11/17
Y1 - 2019/11/17
N2 - Objective: With medical and recreational marijuana legislation expanding throughout the country, the need to educate high-risk populations is evident. The purpose of this study was to assess college students’ perceptions of health communication messages comparing primary and secondary prevention messages concerning marijuana. Participants: Participants (n = 487) included college students, ages 18–25, enrolled in a Midwestern University. Methods: Participants assessed messages based on likeability, creativity, believability, persuasiveness, relevance, and usefulness using an online questionnaire that also included open-end comments. Results: Rasch analyses indicate that nonmarijuana users rated primary prevention messages higher than secondary prevention messages, whereas marijuana users ranked secondary prevention messages more favorably than primary prevention messages. Conclusion: Interventions designed to address marijuana use among college students may be more effective if tailored toward user status. Specifically, primary prevention materials should be designed for abstainers, while secondary prevention messages that focus on harm reduction strategies should be used with marijuana users.
AB - Objective: With medical and recreational marijuana legislation expanding throughout the country, the need to educate high-risk populations is evident. The purpose of this study was to assess college students’ perceptions of health communication messages comparing primary and secondary prevention messages concerning marijuana. Participants: Participants (n = 487) included college students, ages 18–25, enrolled in a Midwestern University. Methods: Participants assessed messages based on likeability, creativity, believability, persuasiveness, relevance, and usefulness using an online questionnaire that also included open-end comments. Results: Rasch analyses indicate that nonmarijuana users rated primary prevention messages higher than secondary prevention messages, whereas marijuana users ranked secondary prevention messages more favorably than primary prevention messages. Conclusion: Interventions designed to address marijuana use among college students may be more effective if tailored toward user status. Specifically, primary prevention materials should be designed for abstainers, while secondary prevention messages that focus on harm reduction strategies should be used with marijuana users.
KW - Health communication
KW - college students
KW - intervention
KW - marijuana
KW - primary prevention
KW - secondary prevention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053600028&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053600028&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/07448481.2018.1506790
DO - 10.1080/07448481.2018.1506790
M3 - Article
C2 - 30240330
AN - SCOPUS:85053600028
SN - 0744-8481
VL - 67
SP - 743
EP - 752
JO - Journal of American College Health
JF - Journal of American College Health
IS - 8
ER -