Professorial fit: perceptions of engineering postdoctoral scholars

Sylvia L. Mendez, Sarah E. Cooksey, Kathryn E. Starkey, Valerie Martin Conley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to explore the perceptions of a diverse set of 16 engineering postdoctoral scholars regarding their fit for the professoriate. The professoriate speaks to the body of tenured/tenure-track faculty within higher education institutions. Design/methodology/approach: An intrinsic case study design was conducted to provide an in-depth understanding of the factors influencing engineering postdoctoral scholars’ perceived professorial fit using person–job fit theory. Findings: As a result of inductive and deductive data analyses techniques, four themes emerged: the professoriate is perceived as a calling for those who desire to teach and mentor the upcoming generation of engineers; research autonomy in the professoriate is highly attractive; the work demands of the professoriate are contrary to the work–life balance sought; and the professoriate appears daunting due to the competitive nature of the job market and the academic environment. Originality/value: This study is critical for those invested in possessing a deeper understanding of the postdoctoral career stage, its relationship to the professoriate as a career choice and broadening participation in engineering academia.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)266-280
Number of pages15
JournalStudies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 4 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited.

Keywords

  • Engineering postdoctoral scholars
  • Intrinsic case study
  • Person–job fit
  • Professoriate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Professorial fit: perceptions of engineering postdoctoral scholars'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this