TY - JOUR
T1 - Programmatic effectiveness of a university-based implant training program
T2 - Long-term, Patient-centered outcomes
AU - Farino, M. M.
AU - Branscum, A.
AU - Robinson, Fonda G.
AU - Jasper, S. J.
AU - Al-Sabbagh, M.
AU - Puleo, D. A.
AU - Thomas, M. V.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - The University of Kentucky College of Dentistry established a formal implant program in 1999. The program utilizes a single system (Straumann) and a team concept in which implants are placed by residents in periodontology or oral and maxillofacial surgery and restored by predoctoral dental students. The program features stringent patient inclusion and exclusion criteria, incremental structured learning experiences, formal standardized protocols, and hands-on preclinical learning experiences. The use of a single system simplified training protocols and inventory requirements. Complete and partially edentulous patients requiring single and multiple implants are eligible for the program, although maxillary anterior sites are excluded. There is a formal quality assurance program to assess patient-centered outcomes. The current report includes data for patients who had implants placed in the period from January 2000 through December 2002. During that period, 192 patients received dental implants, of which 116 patients (248 implants) were available for analysis. The mean follow-up was 7.05 years (median = 7.32 years). The implant survival rate was 98.4%, while the success rate was 93.15%. Success was determined by the absence of pain or mobility, as well as self-reported patient satisfaction with function, appearance, and surgical experience.
AB - The University of Kentucky College of Dentistry established a formal implant program in 1999. The program utilizes a single system (Straumann) and a team concept in which implants are placed by residents in periodontology or oral and maxillofacial surgery and restored by predoctoral dental students. The program features stringent patient inclusion and exclusion criteria, incremental structured learning experiences, formal standardized protocols, and hands-on preclinical learning experiences. The use of a single system simplified training protocols and inventory requirements. Complete and partially edentulous patients requiring single and multiple implants are eligible for the program, although maxillary anterior sites are excluded. There is a formal quality assurance program to assess patient-centered outcomes. The current report includes data for patients who had implants placed in the period from January 2000 through December 2002. During that period, 192 patients received dental implants, of which 116 patients (248 implants) were available for analysis. The mean follow-up was 7.05 years (median = 7.32 years). The implant survival rate was 98.4%, while the success rate was 93.15%. Success was determined by the absence of pain or mobility, as well as self-reported patient satisfaction with function, appearance, and surgical experience.
KW - Dental implants
KW - Implant education
KW - Patient-centered outcomes
KW - Quality assurance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959491211&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959491211&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.v20.i4.90
DO - 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.v20.i4.90
M3 - Article
C2 - 21488827
AN - SCOPUS:79959491211
SN - 1050-6934
VL - 20
SP - 343
EP - 351
JO - Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants
JF - Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants
IS - 4
ER -