Proprioception in the posterior cruciate ligament deficient knee

M. R. Safran, A. A. Allen, S. M. Lephart, P. A. Borsa, F. H. Fu, C. D. Harner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

56 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study was undertaken to evaluate knee proprioception in patients with isolated unilateral posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries. Eighteen subjects with isolated PCL tears were studied 1-234 months after injury. The threshold to detect passive motion (TTDPM) was used to evaluate kinesthesia and the ability to passively reproduce passive positioning (RPP) to test joint position sense. Two starting positions were tested in all knees: 45°(middle range) and 110° (end range) to evaluate knee proprioception when the PCL is under different amounts of tension. TTDPM and RPP were tested as the knee moved into flexion and extension from both starting positions. A statistically significant reduction in TTDPM was identified in PCL-injured knees tested from the 45 ° starting position, moving into flexion and extension. RPP was statistically better in the PCL-deficient knee as tested from 110° moving into flexion and extension. No difference was identified in the TTDPM starting at 110° or in RPP with the presented angle at 45°moving into flexion or extension. These subtle but statistically significant findings suggest that proprioceptive mechanoreceptors may play a clinical role in PCL-intact and PCL-deficient patients. Further, it appears that kinesthesia and joint position sense may function through different mechanisms.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)310-317
Number of pages8
JournalKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Volume7
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1999

Keywords

  • Knee
  • Ligament
  • Posterior cruciate ligament
  • Proprioception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Proprioception in the posterior cruciate ligament deficient knee'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this