Prospective evaluation of mechanomyography versus triggered electromyography for intraoperative assessment of cortical breaches during instrumented lumbar surgery

Harshit Arora, Hassan Darabi, Francis Farhadi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction Pedicle screws are essential in spinal arthrodesis surgeries but pose potential risks due to their proximity to neural and vascular structures. Traditionally, tEMG has been used to assess screw placement, though its invasiveness, low specificity, and cost limit its applicability. MMG may offer a promising alternative for routine clinical use. Our study compares the relative accuracy of triggered electromyography (tEMG) versus mechanomyography (MMG) in detecting intraoperative cortical bony breaches. Methods Using an equivalence trial design, consecutive patients undergoing posterior lumbosacral spinal arthrodesis were prospectively enrolled at a single institution. Pedicle screw trajectories were queried in real-time using combined tEMG and MMG-based evaluations at pretap, tap, post-tap and postscrew placement stages. Intraoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were performed to evaluate pedicle screw trajectories according to the Gertzbein-Robbins (GR) classification. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were performed to evaluate the relative accuracy of tEMG and MMG threshold potentials to detect cortical breaches. Pain and quality-of-life outcomes were evaluated up to 3 months postoperatively. Results A total of 303 consecutive lumbar pedicle screw trajectories were included (61 participants; mean age: 61.3 ± 9.7 years; male-to-female ratio: 32:29). 7 grade C-E GR cortical breaches were identified in a total of 5 subjects, with 5 (71.4%) classified as Grade C and 2 (28.6%) as Grade E. Baseline demographics were comparable between the breach and nonbreach groups. The tEMG and MMG AUC values determining predictive ability for breach detection were comparable for the pretap (AUC 0.82 vs. 0.80, p = .442) and post-tap stages (AUC 0.71 vs. 0.79, p = .380). Follow-up pain and functional assessments revealed significant improvements at last follow-up. Conclusion tEMG and MMG demonstrate high and equivalent accuracy to detect cortical breaches intraoperatively. Adequate utilization of either technique may enhance pedicle screw placement accuracy, reducing intraoperative complications and improving surgical outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100797
JournalNorth American Spine Society Journal
Volume24
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s).

Funding

This investigator-initiated trial was funded by Johnson & Johnson .

FundersFunder number
Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development

    Keywords

    • Equivalence trial
    • Gertzbein-Robbins classification
    • MMG
    • Pedicle screw
    • tEMG

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Surgery
    • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
    • Clinical Neurology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Prospective evaluation of mechanomyography versus triggered electromyography for intraoperative assessment of cortical breaches during instrumented lumbar surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this