Psychometric Validation of the Heart Failure Caregiver Questionnaire (HF-CQ®)

Anna Strömberg, Nicola Bonner, Laura Grant, Bryan Bennett, Misook L. Chung, Tiny Jaarsma, Marie Louise Luttik, Eldrin F. Lewis, Frederico Calado, Celine Deschaseaux

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The Heart Failure Caregiver Questionnaire (HF-CQ®) was developed to assess subjective outcomes of heart failure caregivers. The HF-CQ® comprises 21 questions on three domains, namely physical, emotional/psychological and lifestyle. The objective of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the HF-CQ®. Methods: Patients (n = 150) with heart failure and their primary caregivers (n = 150) were recruited from 11 sites in USA. Caregivers completed the HF-CQ® and additional questionnaires, namely Caregiver Reaction Assessment, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire, EuroQol-5 domain, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Patient-completed Global Impression of Severity, construct validity, concurrent validity, reliability and responsiveness of the HF-CQ® were also assessed. Results: In the physical and lifestyle domains, all items showed acceptable validity. No high correlations between HF-CQ® scores and other caregiver-completed instruments, including the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire, EuroQol-5 domain or Caregiver Reaction Assessment, were reported. The intra-class correlation coefficient exceeded the threshold for reliability (>0.7) across the physical well-being (0.785), emotional/psychological (0.797), lifestyle (0.787) and total scores (0.850), indicating acceptable reliability. Internal consistency results using Cronbach’s alpha showed the total aggregate score of 0.942 to be reliable. In the responsiveness analyses, each of the three scales and the total score showed responsiveness to changes defined by the Caregiver Global Impression of Severity. The overall caregiver burden score increased with increased severity of illness in the cared-for patients. Conclusions: The study provides initial evidence for the acceptable validity of the HF-CQ® as an instrument to measure heart failure caregiver burden.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)579-592
Number of pages14
JournalPatient
Volume10
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Springer International Publishing Switzerland.

Funding

The authors are grateful to Pelle Stolt from MagliaRotta for providing writing support for this article. All authors contributed to the study design, the protocol and the analysis and intrepretation of data. Nicola Bonner, Bryan Bennet, Laura Grant performed the statistical analysis. This study was funded by Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland. Nicola Bonner, Bryan Bennett and Laura Grant work for Adelphi Values and were contracted by Novartis Pharma AG to design and run the validation study and conduct the analyses. Frederico Calado and Celine Deschaseaux are employees of Novartis Pharma AG. Anna Stromberg, Misook Chung, Marie-Louise Luttik, Tiny Jaarsma and Eldring Lewis received consulting fees as advisors on the study scientific design. There are no additional conflicts of interest. Funding This study was funded by Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.

FundersFunder number
Novartis Pharma
Novartis Pharma

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Nursing (miscellaneous)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Psychometric Validation of the Heart Failure Caregiver Questionnaire (HF-CQ®)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this