Publication Track Records as a Metric of Clinical Research Training Effectiveness

Jacqueline M. Knapke, Joel Tsevat, Paul A. Succop, Kpandja Djawe, Pierce Kuhnell, Erin N. Haynes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations


Clinical research training programs exist across the country, but no quantitative studies have been performed to evaluate the effectiveness of these programs. The goal of this study was to evaluate the success of the clinical research training program at the University of Cincinnati by comparing the publication histories of pediatric fellows who graduated from the clinical and translational research Master of Science (MS) degree programs between 1995 and 2011 with fellows who did not pursue an MS degree. Among 296 pediatric fellows, 44 of 54 graduates (81%) published at least 1 first-authored paper, as compared with 149 of 242 (62%) fellows who did not obtain an MS degree (P < 0.01). In multivariable analysis, 3-4 years after program completion, MS graduates published more papers overall (R2 = 0.10) and more first-authored papers than did non-MS graduates (R2 = 0.04). These findings suggest that graduate training in clinical and translational research is related to an increase in research productivity as assessed by publication rates.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)458-462
Number of pages5
JournalClinical and Translational Science
Issue number6
StatePublished - Dec 2013


  • CTSA
  • Clinical research
  • Program evaluation
  • Research education
  • Research training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience (all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Publication Track Records as a Metric of Clinical Research Training Effectiveness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this