TY - JOUR
T1 - Qualitative clinical evaluation of scapular dysfunction
T2 - A reliability study
AU - Kibler, W. Ben
AU - Uhl, Tim L.
AU - Maddux, Jackson W.Q.
AU - Brooks, Paul V.
AU - Zeller, Brian
AU - McMullen, John
PY - 2002/12
Y1 - 2002/12
N2 - The purpose of this study was to determine the intrarater and interrater reliability of a clinical evaluation system for scapular dysfunction. No commonly accepted terminology presently exists for describing the abnormal dynamic scapular movement patterns that are commonly associated with shoulder injury. A method of observation was devised for clinical evaluation of scapular dysfunction. Blinded evaluators (2 physicians and 2 physical therapists) were familiarized with the evaluation method of scapular movement patterns before viewing a videotape of 26 subjects with and without scapular dysfunction. Each evaluator was asked to categorize the predominant scapular movement pattern observed during bilateral humeral scaption and abduction motions. Reliability was assessed by a κ coefficient. Intertester reliability (κ = 0.4) was found to be slightly lower than intratester reliability (κ = 0.5). These results indicate that, with refinement, this qualitative evaluation method may allow clinicians to standardize the categorization of dynamic scapular dysfunction patterns.
AB - The purpose of this study was to determine the intrarater and interrater reliability of a clinical evaluation system for scapular dysfunction. No commonly accepted terminology presently exists for describing the abnormal dynamic scapular movement patterns that are commonly associated with shoulder injury. A method of observation was devised for clinical evaluation of scapular dysfunction. Blinded evaluators (2 physicians and 2 physical therapists) were familiarized with the evaluation method of scapular movement patterns before viewing a videotape of 26 subjects with and without scapular dysfunction. Each evaluator was asked to categorize the predominant scapular movement pattern observed during bilateral humeral scaption and abduction motions. Reliability was assessed by a κ coefficient. Intertester reliability (κ = 0.4) was found to be slightly lower than intratester reliability (κ = 0.5). These results indicate that, with refinement, this qualitative evaluation method may allow clinicians to standardize the categorization of dynamic scapular dysfunction patterns.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036835988&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036835988&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1067/mse.2002.126766
DO - 10.1067/mse.2002.126766
M3 - Article
C2 - 12469078
AN - SCOPUS:0036835988
SN - 1058-2746
VL - 11
SP - 550
EP - 556
JO - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
JF - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
IS - 6
ER -