TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantifying Bacterial Bioburden during Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
T2 - Does the Wound VAC Enhance Bacterial Clearance?
AU - Weed, Tonja
AU - Ratliff, Catherine
AU - Drake, David B.
AU - Fee, Timothy E.
AU - Mast, Bruce
AU - Morain, William D.
AU - Furlow, Leonard T.
PY - 2004/3
Y1 - 2004/3
N2 - The bacterial colonization of a wound is a recognized detrimental factor in the multifactorial process of wound healing. The harmful effects on wound healing are recognized to correspond to a level of > 105 colonies of bacteria per gram of tissue. Negative pressure wound therapy has become an accepted treatment modality for acute and chronic wounds with accelerated healing rates observed. It has been previously reported that this therapy enhances bacterial clearance, which may account for the wound healing effects noted. We retrospectively reviewed 25 patients' charts undergoing Wound VAC (Vacuum Assisted Closure Device; KCI International, San Antonio, TX) therapy with serial quantitative cultures and found that there is not a consistent effect of bacterial clearance with the Wound VAC. Furthermore, bacterial colonization increased significantly with Wound VAC therapy and remained in a range of 104-106. Despite this finding, the beneficial effects of this treatment modality on wound healing were noted in most cases.
AB - The bacterial colonization of a wound is a recognized detrimental factor in the multifactorial process of wound healing. The harmful effects on wound healing are recognized to correspond to a level of > 105 colonies of bacteria per gram of tissue. Negative pressure wound therapy has become an accepted treatment modality for acute and chronic wounds with accelerated healing rates observed. It has been previously reported that this therapy enhances bacterial clearance, which may account for the wound healing effects noted. We retrospectively reviewed 25 patients' charts undergoing Wound VAC (Vacuum Assisted Closure Device; KCI International, San Antonio, TX) therapy with serial quantitative cultures and found that there is not a consistent effect of bacterial clearance with the Wound VAC. Furthermore, bacterial colonization increased significantly with Wound VAC therapy and remained in a range of 104-106. Despite this finding, the beneficial effects of this treatment modality on wound healing were noted in most cases.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1542343993&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1542343993&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/01.sap.0000111861.75927.4d
DO - 10.1097/01.sap.0000111861.75927.4d
M3 - Review article
C2 - 15156981
AN - SCOPUS:1542343993
SN - 0148-7043
VL - 52
SP - 276
EP - 280
JO - Annals of Plastic Surgery
JF - Annals of Plastic Surgery
IS - 3
ER -