R-modafinil (armodafinil): A unique dopamine uptake inhibitor and potential medication for psychostimulant abuse

Claus J. Loland, Maddalena Mereu, Oluyomi M. Okunola, Jianjing Cao, Thomas E. Prisinzano, Sonia Mazier, Theresa Kopajtic, Lei Shi, Jonathan L. Katz, Gianluigi Tanda, Amy Hauck Newman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

122 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: (±)-Modafinil has piqued interest as a treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and stimulant dependence. The R-enantiomer of modafinil might have unique pharmacological properties that should be further investigated. Methods: (±)-Modafinil and its R-(-)- and S-(+)-enantiomers were synthesized and tested for inhibition of [3H] dopamine (DA) uptake and [3H]WIN 35428 binding in human dopamine transporter (DAT) wild-type and mutants with altered conformational equilibria. Data were compared with cocaine and the atypical DA uptake inhibitor, JHW 007. R- and S-modafinil were also evaluated in microdialysis studies in the mouse nucleus accumbens shell and in a cocaine discrimination procedure. Results: (±)-, R-, and S-modafinil bind to the DAT and inhibit DA uptake less potently than cocaine, with R-modafinil having approximately threefold higher affinity than its S-enantiomer. Molecular docking studies revealed subtle differences in binding modes for the enantiomers. R-modafinil was significantly less potent in the DAT Y156F mutant compared with wild-type DAT, whereas S-modafinil was affected less. Studies with the Y335A DAT mutant showed that the R- and S-enantiomers tolerated the inward-facing conformation better than cocaine, which was further supported by [2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl]- methanethiosulfonate reactivity on the DAT E2C I159C. Microdialysis studies demonstrated that both R- and S-modafinil produced increases in extracellular DA concentrations in the nucleus accumbens shell less efficaciously than cocaine and with a longer duration of action. Both enantiomers fully substituted in mice trained to discriminate cocaine from saline. Conclusions: R-modafinil displays an in vitro profile different from cocaine. Future trials with R-modafinil as a substitute therapy with the potential benefit of cognitive enhancement for psychostimulant addiction are warranted.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)405-413
Number of pages9
JournalBiological Psychiatry
Volume72
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2012

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Support for this research was provided to AHN, OMO, JC, TK, MM, JLK, and GT by the National Institute on Drug Abuse Intramural Research Program. CJL is supported by the Lundbeck Foundation and the Danish Council for Independent Research Sapere Aude programme.

Funding

Support for this research was provided to AHN, OMO, JC, TK, MM, JLK, and GT by the National Institute on Drug Abuse Intramural Research Program. CJL is supported by the Lundbeck Foundation and the Danish Council for Independent Research Sapere Aude programme.

FundersFunder number
Danish Council for Independent Research Sapere Aude programme
National Institute on Drug AbuseZIADA000103
Lundbeckfonden

    Keywords

    • Abuse liability
    • addiction
    • cocaine
    • dopamine transporter
    • methamphetamine
    • microdialysis

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Biological Psychiatry

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'R-modafinil (armodafinil): A unique dopamine uptake inhibitor and potential medication for psychostimulant abuse'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this