Randomized, controlled, clinical trial of rice versus glucose oral rehydration solutions in infants and young children with acute watery diarrhoea

A. S.G. Faruque, S. S. Hoque, G. J. Fuchs, D. Mahalanabis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

A randomized clinical trial was carried out to compare a packaged ready- to-mix rice oral rehydration solution (ORS) to the standard glucose ORS for the treatment of childhood diarrhoea. Children were of either gender, aged 3- 35 months, presenting with a history of watery diarrhoea for 72 h or less. The main outcomes examined were stool output, ORS intake, duration of diarrhoea and nutritional recovery during follow-up at 16 d of illness. Stool output in the first 24h (106 vs 107gkg-1), ORS intake in clinic (93 vs 102ml per motion) and duration of diarrhoea (88 h vs 81 h) were similar in the two treatment groups. The few episodes that became persistent were similar (2%) in the two groups. The weight gain during follow-up was similar in the two ORS groups.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1308-1311
Number of pages4
JournalActa Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics
Volume86
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 1997

Keywords

  • Acute diarrhoea
  • Clinical trials
  • Glucose
  • ORS
  • Rice-based ORS

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Randomized, controlled, clinical trial of rice versus glucose oral rehydration solutions in infants and young children with acute watery diarrhoea'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this