TY - JOUR
T1 - Reactive Oxygen Species and Cryopreservation Promote DNA Fragmentation in Equine Spermatozoa
AU - Baumber, Julie
AU - Ball, Barry A.
AU - Linfor, Jennifer J.
AU - Meyers, Stuart A.
PY - 2003
Y1 - 2003
N2 - The objective of this study was to examine the effect of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and cryopreservation on DNA fragmentation of equine spermatozoa. In experiment 1, equine spermatozoa were incubated (1 hour, 38°C) according to the following treatments: 1) sperm alone; 2) sperm + xanthine (X, 0.3 mM)-xanthine oxidase (XO, 0.025 U/mL); 3) sperm + X (0.6 mM)-XO (0.05 U/roL); and 4) sperm + X (1 mM)-XO (0.1 U/mL). In experiment 2, spermatozoa were incubated (1 hour, 38°C) with X (1 mM)-XO (0.1 U/mL) and either catalase (200 U/mL), superoxide dismutase (SOD, 200 U/mL), or reduced glutathione (GSH, 10 mM). Following incubation, DNA fragmentation was determined by the single cell gel electrophoresis (comet) assay. In experiment 3, equine spermatozoa were cryopreserved, and DNA fragmentation was determined in fresh, processed, and postthaw sperm samples. In experiment 1, incubation of equine spermatozoa in the presence of ROS, generated by the X-XO system, increased DNA fragmentation (P < .005). In Experiment 2, the increase in DNA fragmentation associated with X-XO treatment was counteracted by the addition of catalase and GSH but not by SOD, suggesting that hydrogen peroxide and not superoxide appears to be the ROS responsible for such damage. In experiment 3, cryopreservation of equine spermatozoa was associated with an increase (P < .01) in DNA fragmentation when compared with fresh or processed samples. This study indicates that ROS and cryopreservation promote DNA fragmentation in equine spermatozoa; the involvement of ROS in cryopreservation-induced DNA damage remains to be determined.
AB - The objective of this study was to examine the effect of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and cryopreservation on DNA fragmentation of equine spermatozoa. In experiment 1, equine spermatozoa were incubated (1 hour, 38°C) according to the following treatments: 1) sperm alone; 2) sperm + xanthine (X, 0.3 mM)-xanthine oxidase (XO, 0.025 U/mL); 3) sperm + X (0.6 mM)-XO (0.05 U/roL); and 4) sperm + X (1 mM)-XO (0.1 U/mL). In experiment 2, spermatozoa were incubated (1 hour, 38°C) with X (1 mM)-XO (0.1 U/mL) and either catalase (200 U/mL), superoxide dismutase (SOD, 200 U/mL), or reduced glutathione (GSH, 10 mM). Following incubation, DNA fragmentation was determined by the single cell gel electrophoresis (comet) assay. In experiment 3, equine spermatozoa were cryopreserved, and DNA fragmentation was determined in fresh, processed, and postthaw sperm samples. In experiment 1, incubation of equine spermatozoa in the presence of ROS, generated by the X-XO system, increased DNA fragmentation (P < .005). In Experiment 2, the increase in DNA fragmentation associated with X-XO treatment was counteracted by the addition of catalase and GSH but not by SOD, suggesting that hydrogen peroxide and not superoxide appears to be the ROS responsible for such damage. In experiment 3, cryopreservation of equine spermatozoa was associated with an increase (P < .01) in DNA fragmentation when compared with fresh or processed samples. This study indicates that ROS and cryopreservation promote DNA fragmentation in equine spermatozoa; the involvement of ROS in cryopreservation-induced DNA damage remains to be determined.
KW - Antioxidants
KW - DNA damage
KW - Horse
KW - Oxidative stress
KW - Sperm
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1642420425&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1642420425&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/j.1939-4640.2003.tb02714.x
DO - 10.1002/j.1939-4640.2003.tb02714.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 12826702
AN - SCOPUS:1642420425
SN - 0196-3635
VL - 24
SP - 621
EP - 628
JO - Journal of Andrology
JF - Journal of Andrology
IS - 4
ER -