Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Real-World Applications of Imipenem-Cilastatin-Relebactam: Insights From a Multicenter Observational Cohort Study

  • Kaylee E. Caniff
  • , Nicholas Rebold
  • , Xhilda Xhemali
  • , Nikki Tran
  • , Taryn A. Eubank
  • , Kevin W. Garey
  • , Yi Guo
  • , Mei Chang
  • , Katie E. Barber
  • , Tamara Krekel
  • , Mark Biagi
  • , Wesley D. Kufel
  • , Amy Carr
  • , Jillian Hayes
  • , Travis J. Carlson
  • , Jeremy Frens
  • , Veena Venugopalan
  • , Kristen Lucas
  • , Ashlan J. Kunz Coyne
  • , James Sanders
  • Elisabeth Chandler, Rosanna Li, Kayla Antosz, Julie Ann Justo, Russell Benefield, W. Justin Moore, Jennifer Ross, Jenna Adams, Fritzie Albarillo, Sylvia Stefanos, Athena L.V. Hobbs, Nicholas Mercuro, Brian Raux, Kristen Zeitler, Michael J. Rybak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative infections are a substantial threat to patients and public health. Imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam (IMI/REL) is a β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor with expanded activity against MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. This study aims to describe the patient characteristics, prescribing patterns, and clinical outcomes associated with IMI/REL. Methods. This was a retrospective, multicenter, observational study of patients ≥18 years old who received IMI/REL for ≥48 hours for a suspected or confirmed gram-negative infection. The primary outcome was clinical success, defined as improvement or resolution of infection-related signs or symptoms while receiving IMI/REL and the absence of 30-day microbiologic failure. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of clinical success. Results. The study included 151 patients from 24 US medical centers. IMI/REL was predominantly prescribed for lower respiratory tract infections, accounting for 52.3% of cases. Most patients were infected with a carbapenem-nonsusceptible pathogen (85.4%); P aeruginosa was frequently targeted (72.2%). Clinical success was achieved in 70.2% of patients. Heart failure, receipt of antibiotics within the past 90 days, intensive care unit admission at time of index culture collection, and isolation of difficult-to-treat resistant P aeruginosa were independently associated with a reduced odds of clinical success. Adverse events were reported in 6.0% of patients, leading to discontinuation of IMI/REL in 3 instances. Conclusions. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the real-world effectiveness and safety of IMI/REL. Comparative studies and investigations of specific subgroups will further enhance our understanding of IMI/REL in treating MDR infections.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberofaf112
JournalOpen Forum Infectious Diseases
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.

Funding

Financial support. This study was supported by Merck (investigator-initiated grant)

Funders
Merck

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    • carbapenem-resistant
    • gram-negative
    • imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam
    • multidrug-resistant

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Oncology
    • Infectious Diseases

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Real-World Applications of Imipenem-Cilastatin-Relebactam: Insights From a Multicenter Observational Cohort Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this