Recruiting opioid treatment program administrators for a national survey: Outcomes and lessons learned

Benjamin R. Brady, Beth E. Meyerson, Alissa Davis, Greg A. Carter, Sara Najar, Alexa Martinez, Caleb Mueller, Elias O. Higbie, Holden Dal Ponte, Khino Moneva, Natalia C. Bentz, Linnea B. Linde-Krieger, Zhanette Coffee, Arlene N. Mahoney, David Frank, Richard A. Crosby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Globally, access to opioid use disorder treatment remains insufficient. In the US, recent policy changes for opioid use disorder treatment present opportunities to improve patient access to evidence-based methadone treatment. To evaluate the adoption and sustained implementation of these changes, access to a national, representative sample of opioid treatment programs (OTPs, ‘methadone clinics’) is essential. This study reports the outcomes of a recruitment effort for a national sample of OTP administrators. Methods: A stratified random sample of 1000 OTPs was drawn from the US Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's National Opioid Treatment Program Directory. Stratification was based on state-level OTP regulations and county-level opioid overdose rates. OTPs identified as tribal serving, located in jails or prisons, or requiring corporate approval for research participation were deemed ineligible and excluded from the sample. A team of trained researchers called OTP clinics seeking to speak with administrators and obtain their email addresses for study recruitment. Results: In the sample, 885 OTPs were eligible for study recruitment. We contacted a live person by phone at 73 % of OTPs and an administrator at 23 %. Of the administrators reached, 77 % agreed to receive study information and 22 % completed the survey. Total caller time was 276.5 hours at a cost of $5530. Conclusion: Despite a rigorous sampling frame, and a costly and considerable effort, US OTP recruitment outcomes were suboptimal. Innovative strategies are needed to improve administrator recruitment. Recommendations include updating the SAMHSA directory to include administrator contact information (name, phone, email), using diverse outreach methods, and refining call scripts to improve engagement.

Original languageEnglish
Article number104799
JournalInternational Journal of Drug Policy
Volume139
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the Harm Reduction Research Lab of the University of Arizona College of Medicine Tucson, Dept of Family and Community Medicine and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R61DA059889. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

FundersFunder number
Author National Institute on Drug Abuse DA031791 Mark J Ferris National Institute on Drug Abuse DA006634 Mark J Ferris National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism AA026117 Mark J Ferris National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism AA028162 Elizabeth G Pitts National Institute of General Medical Sciences GM102773 Elizabeth G Pitts Peter McManus Charitable Trust Mark J Ferris National Institute on Drug Abuse
National Institutes of Health (NIH)R61DA059889
National Institutes of Health (NIH)

    Keywords

    • Methadone
    • Opioid treatment programs
    • Research recruitment

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Medicine (miscellaneous)
    • Health Policy

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Recruiting opioid treatment program administrators for a national survey: Outcomes and lessons learned'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this