TY - JOUR
T1 - Regional Neuroanatomic Effects on Brain Age Inferred Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ridge Regression
AU - Massett, Roy J.
AU - Maher, Alexander S.
AU - Imms, Phoebe E.
AU - Amgalan, Anar
AU - Chaudhari, Nikhil N.
AU - Chowdhury, Nahian F.
AU - Irimia, Andrei
AU - Weiner, Michael W.
AU - Aisen, Paul
AU - Petersen, Ronald
AU - Jack, Clifford R.
AU - Jagust, William
AU - Trojanowki, John Q.
AU - Toga, Arthur W.
AU - Beckett, Laurel
AU - Green, Robert C.
AU - Saykin, Andrew J.
AU - Morris, John C.
AU - Perrin, Richard J.
AU - Shaw, Leslie M.
AU - Khachaturian, Zaven
AU - Carrillo, Maria
AU - Potter, William
AU - Barnes, Lisa
AU - Bernard, Marie
AU - González, Hector
AU - Ho, Carole
AU - Hsiao, John K.
AU - Jackson, Jonathan
AU - Masliah, Eliezer
AU - Masterman, Donna
AU - Okonkwo, Ozioma
AU - Ryan, Laurie
AU - Silverberg, Nina
AU - Fleisher, Adam
AU - Sacrey, Diana Truran
AU - Fockler, Juliet
AU - Conti, Cat
AU - Veitch, Dallas
AU - Neuhaus, John
AU - Jin, Chengshi
AU - Nosheny, Rachel
AU - Ashford, Miriam
AU - Flenniken, Derek
AU - Kormos, Adrienne
AU - Montine, Tom
AU - Rafii, Michael
AU - Raman, Rema
AU - Jimenez, Gustavo
AU - Jicha, Gregory A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America.
PY - 2023/6/1
Y1 - 2023/6/1
N2 - The biological age of the brain differs from its chronological age (CA) and can be used as biomarker of neural/cognitive disease processes and as predictor of mortality. Brain age (BA) is often estimated from magnetic resonance images (MRIs) using machine learning (ML) that rarely indicates how regional brain features contribute to BA. Leveraging an aggregate training sample of 3 418 healthy controls (HCs), we describe a ridge regression model that quantifies each region’s contribution to BA. After model testing on an independent sample of 651 HCs, we compute the coefficient of partial determination R̄2 p for each regional brain volume to quantify its contribution to BA. Model performance is also evaluated using the correlation r between chronological and biological ages, the mean absolute error (MAE ) and mean squared error (MSE) of BA estimates. On training data, r = 0.92, MSE = 70.94 years, MAE = 6.57 years, and R̄2 = 0.81; on test data, r = 0.90, MSE = 81.96 years, MAE = 7.00 years, and R̄2 = 0.79. The regions whose volumes contribute most to BA are the nucleus accumbens (R̄2 p = 7.27%), inferior temporal gyrus (R̄2 p = 4.03%), thalamus (R̄2 p = 3.61%), brainstem (R̄2 p = 3.29%), posterior lateral sulcus (R̄2 p = 3.22%), caudate nucleus (R̄2 p = 3.05%), orbital gyrus (R̄2 p = 2.96%), and precentral gyrus (R̄2 p = 2.80%). Our ridge regression, although outperformed by the most sophisticated ML approaches, identifies the importance and relative contribution of each brain structure to overall BA. Aside from its interpretability and quasi-mechanistic insights, our model can be used to validate future ML approaches for BA estimation.
AB - The biological age of the brain differs from its chronological age (CA) and can be used as biomarker of neural/cognitive disease processes and as predictor of mortality. Brain age (BA) is often estimated from magnetic resonance images (MRIs) using machine learning (ML) that rarely indicates how regional brain features contribute to BA. Leveraging an aggregate training sample of 3 418 healthy controls (HCs), we describe a ridge regression model that quantifies each region’s contribution to BA. After model testing on an independent sample of 651 HCs, we compute the coefficient of partial determination R̄2 p for each regional brain volume to quantify its contribution to BA. Model performance is also evaluated using the correlation r between chronological and biological ages, the mean absolute error (MAE ) and mean squared error (MSE) of BA estimates. On training data, r = 0.92, MSE = 70.94 years, MAE = 6.57 years, and R̄2 = 0.81; on test data, r = 0.90, MSE = 81.96 years, MAE = 7.00 years, and R̄2 = 0.79. The regions whose volumes contribute most to BA are the nucleus accumbens (R̄2 p = 7.27%), inferior temporal gyrus (R̄2 p = 4.03%), thalamus (R̄2 p = 3.61%), brainstem (R̄2 p = 3.29%), posterior lateral sulcus (R̄2 p = 3.22%), caudate nucleus (R̄2 p = 3.05%), orbital gyrus (R̄2 p = 2.96%), and precentral gyrus (R̄2 p = 2.80%). Our ridge regression, although outperformed by the most sophisticated ML approaches, identifies the importance and relative contribution of each brain structure to overall BA. Aside from its interpretability and quasi-mechanistic insights, our model can be used to validate future ML approaches for BA estimation.
KW - Brain aging
KW - Cognitive decline
KW - Human aging
KW - Imaging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160967246&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85160967246&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/gerona/glac209
DO - 10.1093/gerona/glac209
M3 - Article
C2 - 36183259
AN - SCOPUS:85160967246
SN - 1079-5006
VL - 78
SP - 872
EP - 881
JO - Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
JF - Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
IS - 6
ER -