Resolution of Clinical Signs of Sarcoptic Mange in American Black Bears (Ursus americanus), in Ivermectin-Treated and Nontreated Individuals

Hannah S. Tiffin, Justin D. Brown, Mark Ternent, Brandon Snavely, Emily Carrollo, Ethan Kibe, Frances E. Buderman, Jennifer M. Mullinax, Erika T. Machtinger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

The parasitic mite Sarcoptes scabiei causes mange in nearly 150 species of mammals by burrowing under the skin, triggering hypersensitivity responses that can alter animals’ behavior and result in extreme weight loss, secondary infections, and even death. Since the 1990s, sarcoptic mange has increased in incidence and geographic distribution in Pennsylvania black bear (Ursus americanus) populations, including expansion into other states. Recovery from mange in free-ranging wildlife has rarely been evaluated. Following the Pennsylvania Game Commission’s standard operating procedures at the time of the study, treatment consisted of one subcutaneous injection of ivermectin. To evaluate black bear survival and recovery from mange, from 2018 to 2020 we fitted 61 bears, including 43 with mange, with GPS collars to track their movements and recovery. Bears were collared in triplicates according to sex and habitat, consisting of one bear without mange (healthy control), one scabietic bear treated with ivermectin when collared, and one untreated scabietic bear. Bears were reevaluated for signs of mange during annual den visits, if recaptured during the study period, and after mortality events. Disease status and recovery from mange was determined based on outward gross appearance and presence of S. scabiei mites from skin scrapes. Of the 36 scabietic bears with known recovery status, 81% fully recovered regardless of treatment, with 88% recovered with treatment and 74% recovered without treatment. All bears with no, low, or moderate mite burdens (<16 mites on skin scrapes) fully recovered from mange (n=20), and nearly half of bears with severe mite burden (>16 mites) fully recovered (n=5, 42%). However, nonrecovered status did not indicate mortality, and mange-related mortality was infrequent. Most bears were able to recover from mange irrespective of treatment, potentially indicating a need for reevaluation of the mange wildlife management paradigm.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)434-447
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Wildlife Diseases
Volume60
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024, Wildlife Disease Association, Inc.. All rights reserved.

Funding

The authors thank the many biologists, game wardens, veterinarians, and technicians at the Pennsylvania Game Commission, in particular Quig Stump and Andrew Di Salvo, and personnel at the University of Pennsylvania Wildlife Futures Program, that supported this research. We also thank members of the Penn State Veterinary Entomology Laboratory for their aid collecting research samples during this project, in particular Jessica Brown, Jesse Evans, Kylie Green, Taylor Miller, Alex Pagac, and Karen Poh, and Penn State Statistical Consultants for advising on data analyses. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback on this manuscript. This work was supported by the Summerlee Foundation (grant 205757), and the US Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture and Hatch Appropriations under Hatch Project PEN04608 and accession number 1010032 (E.T.M.) and Hatch Project PEN04758 and accession number 1024904 (F.E.B.). The authors thank the many biologists, game wardens, veterinarians, and technicians at the Pennsylvania Game Commission, in particular Quig Stump and Andrew Di Salvo, and personnel at the University of Pennsylvania Wildlife Futures Program, that supported this research. We also thank members of the Penn State Veterinary Entomology Laboratory for their aid collecting research samples during this project, in particular Jessica Brown, Jesse Evans, Kylie Green, Taylor Miller, Alex Pagac, and Karen Poh, and Penn State Statistical Consultants for advising on data analyses. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback on this manuscript. This work was supported by the Sum-merlee Foundation (grant 205757), and the US Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture and Hatch Appropriations under Hatch Project PEN04608 and accession number 1010032 (E.T.M.) and Hatch Project PEN04758 and accession number 1024904 (F.E.B.).

FundersFunder number
Penn State Statistical Consultants
Summerlee Foundation
Penn State Veterinary Entomology Laboratory
University of Pennsylvania Wildlife Futures Program
US Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Agriculture and Food Research Initiative1010032, PEN04608, 1024904, PEN04758
US Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Agriculture and Food Research Initiative
Sum-merlee Foundation205757

    Keywords

    • Control
    • Sarcoptes scabiei
    • epizootics
    • mange
    • mite
    • parasitic disease
    • scabies
    • wildlife

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
    • Ecology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Resolution of Clinical Signs of Sarcoptic Mange in American Black Bears (Ursus americanus), in Ivermectin-Treated and Nontreated Individuals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this