Resorbable Versus Nonresorbable Membranes: When and Why?

Noel Ye Naung, Ehab Shehata, Joseph E. Van Sickels

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

Guided bone-regeneration techniques use either resorbable or nonresorbable membrane. Ideal membrane material should be biocompatible with tissue integration, be able to create and maintain space, be occlusive with selective permeability, and have good handling properties. Commercially available nonresorbable membranes are Gor-tex (e-PTFE), Cytoplast (d-PTFE), and titanium mesh. Resorbable membranes are available as natural and synthetic. Clinical trials, a systematic review and meta-analysis have shown no statistically significant difference in most clinical indications between both types of membrane. The choice of membrane varies according to the choice of grafting materials and nature of defect.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)419-431
Number of pages13
JournalDental Clinics of North America
Volume63
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Inc.

Keywords

  • Barrier membrane
  • Guided bone regeneration
  • Guided tissue regeneration
  • Nonresorbable membrane
  • Resorbable membrane

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry (all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Resorbable Versus Nonresorbable Membranes: When and Why?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this