Response to physical rehabilitation and recovery trajectories following critical illness: Individual participant data meta-analysis protocol

Jennifer R.A. Jones, Sue Berney, Michael J. Berry, D. Clark Files, David M. Griffith, Luke A. McDonald, Peter E. Morris, Marc Moss, Amy Nordon-Craft, Timothy Walsh, Ian Gordon, Amalia Karahalios, Zudin Puthucheary, Linda Denehy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction The number of inconclusive physical rehabilitation randomised controlled trials for patients with critical illness is increasing. Evidence suggests critical illness patient subgroups may exist that benefit from targeted physical rehabilitation interventions that could improve their recovery trajectory. We aim to identify critical illness patient subgroups that respond to physical rehabilitation and map recovery trajectories according to physical function and quality of life outcomes. Additionally, the utilisation of healthcare resources will be examined for subgroups identified. Methods and analysis This is an individual participant data meta-analysis protocol. A systematic literature review was conducted for randomised controlled trials that delivered additional physical rehabilitation for patients with critical illness during their acute hospital stay, assessed chronic disease burden, with a minimum follow-up period of 3 months measuring performance-based physical function and health-related quality of life outcomes. From 2178 records retrieved in the systematic literature review, four eligible trials were identified by two independent reviewers. Principal investigators of eligible trials were invited to contribute their data to this individual participant data meta-analysis. Risk of bias will be assessed (Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials). Participant and trial characteristics, interventions and outcomes data of included studies will be summarised. Meta-analyses will entail a one-stage model, which will account for the heterogeneity across and the clustering between studies. Multiple imputation using chained equations will be used to account for the missing data. Ethics and dissemination This individual participant data meta-analysis does not require ethical review as anonymised participant data will be used and no new data collected. Additionally, eligible trials were granted approval by institutional review boards or research ethics committees and informed consent was provided for participants. Data sharing agreements are in place permitting contribution of data. The study findings will be disseminated at conferences and through peer-reviewed publications. PROSPERO registration number CRD42019152526.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere035613
JournalBMJ Open
Volume10
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 4 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Funding

This work is supported by an Austin Medical Research Foundation Project Grant. JRAJ received funding from Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship to support her PhD studies. LD, SB and IG received funding from National Health and Medical Research Council (grant no 454717), Physiotherapy Research Foundation, Austin Medical Research Foundation and Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society related to this work. MM and AN-C received funding from National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR, grant no R01 NR011051) and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI, grant no K24 HL089223) from National Institutes of Health (NIH) related to this work. PEM, MJB and DCF received funding from NIH/NINR/NHLBI (grant no 1R01NR011186) related to this work. MJB received grant funding from Isagenix LLC outside the submitted work. DCF has received honoraria for consultancy from Cytovale. TW and DMG received funding from the Chief Scientist Office, Scotland (grant no CZH/4/531) related to this work. ZP has received honoraria for consultancy from Fresenius Kabi, Orion Pharmaceuticals, Lyric Pharmaceuticals, Faraday Pharmaceuticals and Nestle. The funders did not influence the study design or writing of this manuscript.

FundersFunder number
Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society
Isagenix International, LLC
National Institutes of Health (NIH)1R01NR011186
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)K24 HL089223
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
National Institute of Health National Institute of Nursing ResearchR01NR011051
National Institute of Health National Institute of Nursing Research
Austin Medical Research Foundation
Chief Scientist OfficeCZH/4/531
Chief Scientist Office
Australian National Health and Medical Research Council454717
Australian National Health and Medical Research Council
Physiotherapy Research Foundation

    Keywords

    • adult intensive & critical care
    • intensive & critical care
    • rehabilitation medicine

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General Medicine

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Response to physical rehabilitation and recovery trajectories following critical illness: Individual participant data meta-analysis protocol'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this