Return to sport decisions after an acute lateral ankle sprain injury: Introducing the PAASS framework - An international multidisciplinary consensus

Michelle D. Smith, Bill Vicenzino, Roald Bahr, Thomas Bandholm, Rosalyn Cooke, Luciana De Michelis Mendonça, François Fourchet, Philip Glasgow, Phillip A. Gribble, Lee Herrington, Claire E. Hiller, Sae Yong Lee, Andrea Macaluso, Romain Meeusen, Oluwatoyosi B.A. Owoeye, Duncan Reid, Bruno Tassignon, Masafumi Terada, Kristian Thorborg, Evert VerhagenJo Verschueren, Dan Wang, Rod Whiteley, Erik A. Wikstrom, Eamonn Delahunt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Despite being the most commonly incurred sports injury with a high recurrence rate, there are no guidelines to inform return to sport (RTS) decisions following acute lateral ankle sprain injuries. We aimed to develop a list of assessment items to address this gap. Methods We used a three-round Delphi survey approach to develop consensus of opinion among 155 globally diverse health professionals working in elite field or court sports. This involved surveys that were structured in question format with both closed-response and open-response options. We asked panellists to indicate their agreement about whether or not assessment items should support the RTS decision after an acute lateral ankle sprain injury. The second and third round surveys included quantitative and qualitative feedback from the previous round. We defined a priori consensus being reached at >70% agree or disagree responses. Results Sixteen assessment items reached consensus to be included in the RTS decision after an acute lateral ankle sprain injury. They were mapped to five domains with 98% panellist agreement - PAASS: Pain (during sport participation and over the last 24 hours), Ankle impairments (range of motion; muscle strength, endurance and power), Athlete perception (perceived ankle confidence/reassurance and stability; psychological readiness), Sensorimotor control (proprioception; dynamic postural control/balance), Sport/functional performance (hopping, jumping and agility; sport-specific drills; ability to complete a full training session). Conclusion Expert opinion indicated that pain severity, ankle impairments, sensorimotor control, athlete perception/readiness and sport/functional performance should be assessed to inform the RTS decision following an acute lateral ankle sprain injury. Trial registration number ACTRN12619000522112.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1270-1276
Number of pages7
JournalBritish Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume55
Issue number22
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Keywords

  • ankle
  • athletes
  • consensus
  • sport
  • sprains and strains

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Return to sport decisions after an acute lateral ankle sprain injury: Introducing the PAASS framework - An international multidisciplinary consensus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this