Revealing the reporting disparity: VigiBase highlights underreporting of clozapine in other Western European countries compared to the UK

Carlos De las Cuevas, Emilio J. Sanz, Jason A. Gross, Christoph U. Correll, Hélène Verdoux, John Lally, Renato de Filippis, Peter F.J. Schulte, Espen Molden, Manuel Arrojo-Romero, Adrian D. Bostrom, Georgios Schoretsanitis, Emilio Fernandez-Egea, Jose de Leon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Pharmacovigilance studies indicate clozapine history is marked by adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Objective: In a 2021 article, the United Kingdom (UK) had >90 % of European clozapine-related fatal outcomes in VigiBase, the World Health Organization's pharmacovigilance database. Two possibly opposing hypotheses could explain this disparity: 1) fewer reported fatal outcomes in other Western European countries mainly reflect underreporting to VigiBase, and 2) the higher number of UK reports reflects higher real relative mortality. Methods: VigiBase reports from clozapine's introduction to December 31, 2022, were studied for ADRs and the top 10 causes of fatal outcomes. The UK was compared with 11 other top reporting Western countries (Germany, Denmark, France, Finland, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland). Nine countries (except Ireland and Switzerland) were compared after controlling for population and clozapine prescriptions. Results: The UK accounted for 29 % of worldwide clozapine-related fatal outcomes, Germany 2 % and <1 % in each of the other countries. The nonspecific label “death” was the top cause in the world (46 %) and in the UK (33 %). “Pneumonia” was second in the world (8 %), the UK (12 %), Ireland (8 %) and Finland (14 %). Assuming that our corrections for population and clozapine use are correct, other countries underreported only 1–10 % of the UK clozapine fatal outcome number. Conclusions: Different Western European countries consistently underreport to VigiBase compared to the UK, but have different reporting/publishing styles for clozapine-related ADRs/fatal outcomes. Three Scandinavian registries suggest lives are saved as clozapine use increases, but this cannot be studied in pharmacovigilance databases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)175-188
Number of pages14
JournalSchizophrenia Research
Volume268
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)

Funding

The authors acknowledge Lorraine Maw, M.A. from the University of Kentucky Mental Health Research Center at Eastern State Hospital, who helped in editing the article. The authors are indebted to the national centers which make up the World Health Organization (WHO) Program for International Drug Monitoring and contribute reports to VigiBase at the Uppsala Monitoring Centre. The information comes from a variety of sources, and the probability that the suspected adverse effect is drug-related is not the same in all cases. However, the opinions and conclusions of this study are not necessarily those of the various centers or of the WHO.

FundersFunder number
Lorraine Maw
University of Kentucky Mental Health Research Center at Eastern State Hospital
World Health Organization

    Keywords

    • Clozapine/administration and dosage
    • Clozapine/adverse effects
    • Clozapine/therapeutic use
    • Drug labeling
    • Europe
    • Schizophrenia

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Psychiatry and Mental health
    • Biological Psychiatry

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Revealing the reporting disparity: VigiBase highlights underreporting of clozapine in other Western European countries compared to the UK'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this