TY - JOUR
T1 - Revising appointment, promotion, and tenure procedures to incorporate an expanded definition of scholarship
T2 - The University of Kentucky College of Medicine experience
AU - Nora, Lois Margaret
AU - Pomeroy, Claire
AU - Curry, Thomas E.
AU - Hill, Nancy S.
AU - Tibbs, Phillip A.
AU - Wilson, Emery A.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - Scholarly activity and scholarly productivity are key features of the academic health center (AHC) and the work of college of medicine faculty. Recent changes in the academic environment of the University of Kentucky (UK) College of Medicine led to an examination of its appointment, promotion, and tenure procedures. This, in turn, led to a re-examination of the college's definition of scholarship. This article describes three of UK's scholarship-related challenges, particularly those related to clinical departments. The authors describe some of the new procedures being implemented to address these challenges; these include new faculty designations, clearer articulation of promotion procedures, explicit recognition of multiple forms of scholarship, expectations for investment in junior faculty, and mandatory discussion of faculty success in chairs' annual reviews. Faculty reactions, positive and negative, to these changes in procedures are also presented.
AB - Scholarly activity and scholarly productivity are key features of the academic health center (AHC) and the work of college of medicine faculty. Recent changes in the academic environment of the University of Kentucky (UK) College of Medicine led to an examination of its appointment, promotion, and tenure procedures. This, in turn, led to a re-examination of the college's definition of scholarship. This article describes three of UK's scholarship-related challenges, particularly those related to clinical departments. The authors describe some of the new procedures being implemented to address these challenges; these include new faculty designations, clearer articulation of promotion procedures, explicit recognition of multiple forms of scholarship, expectations for investment in junior faculty, and mandatory discussion of faculty success in chairs' annual reviews. Faculty reactions, positive and negative, to these changes in procedures are also presented.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033795577&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033795577&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00001888-200009000-00014
DO - 10.1097/00001888-200009000-00014
M3 - Article
C2 - 10995614
AN - SCOPUS:0033795577
SN - 1040-2446
VL - 75
SP - 913
EP - 924
JO - Academic Medicine
JF - Academic Medicine
IS - 9
ER -