Abstract
This is an excerpt of Chapter 2 of Murray and DeSanctis’s, Advanced Legal Writing and Oral Advocacy: Trials, Appeals, and Moot Court (Foundation Press, forthcoming, December 2013). The goal of the chapter is to teach law students to: frame arguments to the best advantage of the client; deliver a persuasive, logical argument by way of its structure, its style of discourse, and its contents; target the values and preferences of the audience through a careful consideration of the emotional impact of the discourse; project competence, mastery of the material, and trustworthiness through the contents of the discourse; and discover the best possible modes of persuasion to address the issues and requirements of the situation at hand.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Advanced Legal Writing and Oral Advocacy: Trials, Appeals, and Moot Court |
| Editors | Christy H. DeSanctis, Michael D. Murray |
| Edition | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 8 2013 |
Keywords
- rhetoric
- advocacy
- writing
- legal writing
- appellate briefs
- trial briefs
- appellate advocacy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Rhetoric and Advocacy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver