Safe Use of Butorphanol–Azaperone–Medetomidine to Immobilize Free-Ranging White-tailed Deer

Joseph R. McDermott, Wendy Leuenberger, Caleb A. Haymes, Garrett B. Clevinger, Jonathan K. Trudeau, Tim C. Carter, John T. Hast, Gabriel S.W. Jenkins, Will E. Bowling, John J. Cox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Butorphanol–Azaperone–Medetomidine (BAM) is a relatively new drug mixture compounded for the past decade to immobilize mammals, particularly ungulates. Despite its increased use in recent years, scant research has quantified the physiologic responses of immobilized animals or assessed its relative efficacy using different trapping methods. We tested the safety and efficacy of BAM for use in the immobilization of 198 free-ranging white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) captured using drop-nets, Clover traps, and gun-propelled darts from 1 January 2014 to 28 July 2016 in Kentucky and Indiana, USA. Use of BAM produced a safe and satisfactory plane of immobilization that rarely required treatment of side effects. First signs of induction were observed on average at 4.4 ± 0.2 (standard error) minutes post–intramuscular administration, and deer reached lateral recumbency at 8.6 ± 0.4 minutes. Times to first signs of induction and the induction period were longer for adults than for juveniles, while times to the first sign of reversal, lifting head, and standing were longer for juveniles than adults. Although physiologic responses of deer during induction were within published norms, respiration rates, body temperature, heart rates, and oxygen saturation typically declined throughout the immobilization period. Our BAM dose did not affect time to recovery or heart rate. Regardless of trapping method, on average, heart rate was 61.2 ± 0.7 beats/minute, respiratory rate was 29.1 ± 0.5 breaths/minute, temperature was 38.93° ± 0.04° C, and oxygen saturation was 85.0% ± 0.3%. Deer showed first signs of reversal at 4.3 ± 0.3 minutes after administration of the reversal agent intramuscularly or half-intramuscularly and half-intravenously and were fully recovered after 6.3 ± 0.4 minutes. In summary, we found that BAM was an efficacious and safe drug to use on white-tailed deer captured by a variety of trapping methods.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)281-291
Number of pages11
JournalWildlife Society Bulletin
Volume44
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We thank the U.S. Forest Service Redbird Ranger District personnel in southeastern Kentucky, Morgan‐Monroe and Yellowwood State forests personnel in Indiana, and the many private landowners in both states for access to study sites. We also thank the many Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources (KDFWR) and Indiana Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) agency personnel and seasonal technicians that assisted with fieldwork. We thank the Bowling family for providing housing in Kentucky. We thank I. Stasiak for helpful comments in improving the manuscript. This project was funded by a Pittman‐Robertson grant administered by KDFWR and a Wildlife Restoration Grant administered by IDNR (W48R1). This work was also supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, McIntire‐Stennis Program #KY009031. We thank the Associate Editor and reviewers for their contributions to this manuscript.

Funding Information:
We thank the U.S. Forest Service Redbird Ranger District personnel in southeastern Kentucky, Morgan-Monroe and Yellowwood State forests personnel in Indiana, and the many private landowners in both states for access to study sites. We also thank the many Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources (KDFWR) and Indiana Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) agency personnel and seasonal technicians that assisted with fieldwork. We thank the Bowling family for providing housing in Kentucky. We thank I. Stasiak for helpful comments in improving the manuscript. This project was funded by a Pittman-Robertson grant administered by KDFWR and a Wildlife Restoration Grant administered by IDNR (W48R1). This work was also supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, McIntire-Stennis Program #KY009031. We thank the Associate Editor and reviewers for their contributions to this manuscript.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Wildlife Society

Keywords

  • BAM
  • Butorphanol–Azaperone–Medetomidine
  • Indiana
  • Kentucky
  • Odocoileus virginianus
  • capture
  • free-ranging
  • immobilization
  • mammal
  • white-tailed deer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Safe Use of Butorphanol–Azaperone–Medetomidine to Immobilize Free-Ranging White-tailed Deer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this