Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Safety and immunogenicity of the recombinant zoster vaccine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using abatacept: a pilot multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial

  • Jeremy A. Hawkins
  • , Jeffrey R. Curtis
  • , Adriana Weinberg
  • , Sarah A.R. Siegel
  • , Joseph E. Huffstutter
  • , James Loveless
  • , Suzanne Gharib
  • , Shanmugapriya Reddy
  • , Jayashree Sinha
  • , David Ridley
  • , Ilhem Messaoudi
  • , Jin Kyun Park
  • , Eun Bong Lee
  • , Kevin L. Winthrop

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using abatacept. METHODS: We randomised 70 participants to receive 2 doses of RZV or placebo 8 weeks apart. The primary immunologic endpoint was the proportion of participants developing a ≥4-fold increase in anti-glycoprotein E (gE) immunoglobulin (Ig)G antibodies (humoral responders) and those developing a ≥2-fold increase in interferon gamma (IFN-γ)+ or interleukin-2 (IL-2)+ gE-specific spot-forming cells (cellular responders), at week 12 (ie, 4 weeks post-second RZV dose). The secondary immunologic endpoint was the geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) in cellular and humoral vaccine responses. For safety, we solicited adverse events following each dose, serious adverse events (SAEs) during the 52-week study period, and evaluated the potential for RA flares by assessing pre- and postvaccination Disease activity score-28 for rheumatoid arthritis with erythrocyte sedimentation rate, Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), and Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) rheumatoid arthritis flare questionnaire (RA-FQ) scores. RESULTS: Fifty-six (75%) participants received RZV, and 14 (25%) received a placebo. Among those receiving RZV, only 22 (42.3%) of participants surpassed the 4-fold threshold for humoral response, and anti-gE IgG GMFR at week 12 was 4.55 (3.16, 6.47). Only 5 (10.2%) patients with RZV mounted cellular responses. Six SAEs were noted, and the proportion of patients with RA flare was similar between RZV and placebo groups (38 [68%] vs 9 [64%]). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that RZV is safe in patients with RA using abatacept, but that the vaccine response is attenuated in such patients. Further studies should be undertaken to evaluate whether holding abatacept around the time of vaccination would improve vaccine response.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)787-796
Number of pages10
JournalAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Volume85
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2026 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Funding

This study was supported through an investigator-initiated research grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The project described was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences , National Institutes of Health, United States , through grant award No. UL1TR002369 and NIAMS P30AR072583 . The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official view of the National Institutes of Health.

FundersFunder number
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
Bristol-Myers Squibb
National Institutes of Health (NIH)UL1TR002369
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin DiseasesP30AR072583

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Immunology and Allergy
    • Rheumatology
    • Immunology
    • General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Safety and immunogenicity of the recombinant zoster vaccine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using abatacept: a pilot multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this