TY - JOUR
T1 - Secondhand smoke exposure among young adult sexual minority bar and nightclub patrons
AU - Fallin, Amanda
AU - Neilands, Torsten B.
AU - Jordan, Jeffrey W.
AU - Ling, Pamela M.
PY - 2014/2
Y1 - 2014/2
N2 - Objectives. We compared exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) and attitudes toward smoke-free bar and nightclub policies among patrons of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) and non-LGBT bars and nightclubs. Methods. We conducted randomized time-location sampling surveys of young adults (aged 21-30 years) in 7 LGBT (n = 1113 patrons) and 12 non-LGBT (n = 1068 patrons) venues in Las Vegas, Nevada, in 2011, as part of a crosssectional study of a social branding intervention to promote a tobacco-free lifestyle and environment in bars and nightclubs. Results. Compared with non-LGBT bars and nightclubs, patrons of LGBT venues had 38% higher adjusted odds of having been exposed to SHS in a bar or nightclub in the past 7 days but were no less likely to support smoke-free policies and intended to go out at least as frequently if a smoke-free bar and nightclub law was passed. Conclusions. The policy environment in LGBT bars and nightclubs appears favorable for the enactment of smoke-free policies, which would protect patrons from SHS and promote a smoke-free social norm.
AB - Objectives. We compared exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) and attitudes toward smoke-free bar and nightclub policies among patrons of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) and non-LGBT bars and nightclubs. Methods. We conducted randomized time-location sampling surveys of young adults (aged 21-30 years) in 7 LGBT (n = 1113 patrons) and 12 non-LGBT (n = 1068 patrons) venues in Las Vegas, Nevada, in 2011, as part of a crosssectional study of a social branding intervention to promote a tobacco-free lifestyle and environment in bars and nightclubs. Results. Compared with non-LGBT bars and nightclubs, patrons of LGBT venues had 38% higher adjusted odds of having been exposed to SHS in a bar or nightclub in the past 7 days but were no less likely to support smoke-free policies and intended to go out at least as frequently if a smoke-free bar and nightclub law was passed. Conclusions. The policy environment in LGBT bars and nightclubs appears favorable for the enactment of smoke-free policies, which would protect patrons from SHS and promote a smoke-free social norm.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893419638&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893419638&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301657
DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301657
M3 - Article
C2 - 24328626
AN - SCOPUS:84893419638
SN - 0090-0036
VL - 104
SP - e148-e153
JO - American Journal of Public Health
JF - American Journal of Public Health
IS - 2
ER -