Abstract
Amid crises of trust in government, the legitimacy of public organizations has never been more important. In this context, access to performance information ensures democratic control and thus legitimacy. However, performance evaluation is hindered by transaction costs in accessing and cognitive biases in interpreting performance. We examine two antecedents of citizen evaluations of performance: sector and bureaucratic reputation. Utilizing two experiments on a representative sample of Indian citizens, we situate our paper amid the increasing privatization of public services, and reputation management strategies used to influence performance evaluations. We discuss our findings and their implications for public management theory and practice.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 457-484 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| Journal | Administration and Society |
| Volume | 55 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2023.
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was generously supported by the National University of Singapore (Tier 1 Ministry of Education Grant).
| Funders |
|---|
| National University Hospital, Singapore |
| Ministry of Education China |
Keywords
- India
- citizen evaluation of performance
- performance management
- privatization
- reputation
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science
- Public Administration
- Marketing
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Sector-Switching, Bureaucratic Reputation, and Citizen Evaluation of Performance: Evidence From a Large-Scale Experiment in India'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver