Sector-Switching, Bureaucratic Reputation, and Citizen Evaluation of Performance: Evidence From a Large-Scale Experiment in India

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Amid crises of trust in government, the legitimacy of public organizations has never been more important. In this context, access to performance information ensures democratic control and thus legitimacy. However, performance evaluation is hindered by transaction costs in accessing and cognitive biases in interpreting performance. We examine two antecedents of citizen evaluations of performance: sector and bureaucratic reputation. Utilizing two experiments on a representative sample of Indian citizens, we situate our paper amid the increasing privatization of public services, and reputation management strategies used to influence performance evaluations. We discuss our findings and their implications for public management theory and practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)457-484
Number of pages28
JournalAdministration and Society
Volume55
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was generously supported by the National University of Singapore (Tier 1 Ministry of Education Grant).

Funders
National University Hospital, Singapore
Ministry of Education China

    Keywords

    • India
    • citizen evaluation of performance
    • performance management
    • privatization
    • reputation

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science
    • Public Administration
    • Marketing

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Sector-Switching, Bureaucratic Reputation, and Citizen Evaluation of Performance: Evidence From a Large-Scale Experiment in India'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this