Sensitivity and Specificity of an Executive Function Screener at Identifying Children With ADHD and Reading Disability

Justin E. Karr, Michelle Y. Kibby, Audreyana C. Jagger-Rickels, Mauricio A. Garcia-Barrera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the sensitivity/specificity of a global sum score (GSS) from the Behavior Assessment System for Children, Second Edition, Executive Function screener (BASC-2-EF) at classifying children with/without ADHD and/or reading disability (RD). Method: The BASC-2 Teacher/Parent Rating Scales (TRS/PRS) were completed for children (8-12 years old; 43.1% female) with no diagnosis (n = 53), RD (n = 34), ADHD (n = 85), co-morbid RD/ADHD (n = 36), and other diagnoses (n = 15). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses evaluated the sensitivity/specificity of the BASC-2-EF GSS at discriminating between children with/without ADHD or RD. Results: Area under the curve (AUC) scores indicated the sensitivity/specificity of the BASC-2-EF GSS at discriminating between children with/without ADHD (TRS: AUC =.831, p <.001; PRS: AUC =.919, p <.001), with/without RD (TRS: AUC =.724, p =.001; PRS: AUC =.615, p =.101), and with ADHD or RD through post hoc analysis (TRS: AUC =.674, p =.006; PRS: AUC =.819, p <.001). Conclusion: The findings support utilizing the BASC-2-EF GSS when differentiating ADHD from RD and typical development.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)134-140
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Attention Disorders
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2018.

Keywords

  • ADHD
  • BASC-2
  • executive function
  • factor analysis
  • psychometrics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sensitivity and Specificity of an Executive Function Screener at Identifying Children With ADHD and Reading Disability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this