TY - JOUR
T1 - Shower thoughts
T2 - why scientists should spend more time in the rain
AU - Van Stan, John T.
AU - Allen, Scott T.
AU - Aubrey, Douglas P.
AU - Carter Berry, Z.
AU - Biddick, Matthew
AU - Coenders-Gerrits, Miriam A.M.J.
AU - Giordani, Paolo
AU - Gotsch, Sybil G.
AU - Gutmann, Ethan D.
AU - Kuzyakov, Yakov
AU - Magyar, Donat
AU - Mella, Valentina S.A.
AU - Mueller, Kevin E.
AU - Ponette-Gonzalez, Alexandra G.
AU - Porada, Philipp
AU - Rosenfeld, Carla E.
AU - Simmons, Jack
AU - Sridhar, Kandikere R.
AU - Stubbins, Aron
AU - Swanson, Travis
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©TheAuthor(s)2023.
PY - 2023/6/1
Y1 - 2023/6/1
N2 - Stormwater is a vital resource and dynamic driver of terrestrial ecosystem processes. However, processes controlling interactions during and shortly after storms are often poorly seen and poorly sensed when direct observations are substituted with technological ones. We discuss how human observations complement technological ones and the benefits of scientists spending more time in the storm. Human observation can reveal ephemeral storm-related phenomena such as biogeochemical hot moments, organismal responses, and sedimentary processes that can then be explored in greater resolution using sensors and virtual experiments. Storm-related phenomena trigger lasting, oversized impacts on hydrologic and biogeochemical processes, organismal traits or functions, and ecosystem services at all scales. We provide examples of phenomena in forests, across disciplines and scales, that have been overlooked in past research to inspire mindful, holistic observation of ecosystems during storms. We conclude that technological observations alone are insufficient to trace the process complexity and unpredictability of fleeting biogeochemical or ecological events without the shower thoughts produced by scientists' human sensory and cognitive systems during storms.
AB - Stormwater is a vital resource and dynamic driver of terrestrial ecosystem processes. However, processes controlling interactions during and shortly after storms are often poorly seen and poorly sensed when direct observations are substituted with technological ones. We discuss how human observations complement technological ones and the benefits of scientists spending more time in the storm. Human observation can reveal ephemeral storm-related phenomena such as biogeochemical hot moments, organismal responses, and sedimentary processes that can then be explored in greater resolution using sensors and virtual experiments. Storm-related phenomena trigger lasting, oversized impacts on hydrologic and biogeochemical processes, organismal traits or functions, and ecosystem services at all scales. We provide examples of phenomena in forests, across disciplines and scales, that have been overlooked in past research to inspire mindful, holistic observation of ecosystems during storms. We conclude that technological observations alone are insufficient to trace the process complexity and unpredictability of fleeting biogeochemical or ecological events without the shower thoughts produced by scientists' human sensory and cognitive systems during storms.
KW - climate change
KW - condensation
KW - ecosystem functioning
KW - extreme event biogeochemistry
KW - field and laboratory studies
KW - precipitation
KW - sampling bias
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85165911088&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85165911088&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/biosci/biad044
DO - 10.1093/biosci/biad044
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85165911088
SN - 0006-3568
VL - 73
SP - 441
EP - 452
JO - BioScience
JF - BioScience
IS - 6
ER -