Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Shower thoughts: why scientists should spend more time in the rain

  • John T. Van Stan
  • , Scott T. Allen
  • , Douglas P. Aubrey
  • , Z. Carter Berry
  • , Matthew Biddick
  • , Miriam A.M.J. Coenders-Gerrits
  • , Paolo Giordani
  • , Sybil G. Gotsch
  • , Ethan D. Gutmann
  • , Yakov Kuzyakov
  • , Donat Magyar
  • , Valentina S.A. Mella
  • , Kevin E. Mueller
  • , Alexandra G. Ponette-Gonzalez
  • , Philipp Porada
  • , Carla E. Rosenfeld
  • , Jack Simmons
  • , Kandikere R. Sridhar
  • , Aron Stubbins
  • , Travis Swanson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Stormwater is a vital resource and dynamic driver of terrestrial ecosystem processes. However, processes controlling interactions during and shortly after storms are often poorly seen and poorly sensed when direct observations are substituted with technological ones. We discuss how human observations complement technological ones and the benefits of scientists spending more time in the storm. Human observation can reveal ephemeral storm-related phenomena such as biogeochemical hot moments, organismal responses, and sedimentary processes that can then be explored in greater resolution using sensors and virtual experiments. Storm-related phenomena trigger lasting, oversized impacts on hydrologic and biogeochemical processes, organismal traits or functions, and ecosystem services at all scales. We provide examples of phenomena in forests, across disciplines and scales, that have been overlooked in past research to inspire mindful, holistic observation of ecosystems during storms. We conclude that technological observations alone are insufficient to trace the process complexity and unpredictability of fleeting biogeochemical or ecological events without the shower thoughts produced by scientists' human sensory and cognitive systems during storms.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)441-452
Number of pages12
JournalBioScience
Volume73
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
©TheAuthor(s)2023.

Funding

JTVS and SGG acknowledge support from the US National Science Foundation (EAR-HS grant no. 1954538). ZCB's contributions were supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (through grant no. 2020–67014–30916). DPA's contributions were supported by the US Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (through grant no. 2019–67019–29906) and the McIntire Stennis project (grant no. 1023985), and was based on work supported by the Department of Energy to the University of Georgia Research Foundation (grant no. DE-EM0004391) and to the US Forest Service Savannah River (grant no. DE-EM0003622).

FundersFunder number
Ear
U.S. Department of Energy
U.S. Forest Service–Savannah RiverDE-EM0003622
US Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Agriculture and Food Research Initiative2019–67019–29906, 1023985, 2020–67014–30916
University of Georgia Research FoundationDE-EM0004391
National Science Foundation Arctic Social Science Program1954538

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
      SDG 13 Climate Action
    2. SDG 15 - Life on Land
      SDG 15 Life on Land

    Keywords

    • climate change
    • condensation
    • ecosystem functioning
    • extreme event biogeochemistry
    • field and laboratory studies
    • precipitation
    • sampling bias

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Shower thoughts: why scientists should spend more time in the rain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this