Abstract
Stormwater is a vital resource and dynamic driver of terrestrial ecosystem processes. However, processes controlling interactions during and shortly after storms are often poorly seen and poorly sensed when direct observations are substituted with technological ones. We discuss how human observations complement technological ones and the benefits of scientists spending more time in the storm. Human observation can reveal ephemeral storm-related phenomena such as biogeochemical hot moments, organismal responses, and sedimentary processes that can then be explored in greater resolution using sensors and virtual experiments. Storm-related phenomena trigger lasting, oversized impacts on hydrologic and biogeochemical processes, organismal traits or functions, and ecosystem services at all scales. We provide examples of phenomena in forests, across disciplines and scales, that have been overlooked in past research to inspire mindful, holistic observation of ecosystems during storms. We conclude that technological observations alone are insufficient to trace the process complexity and unpredictability of fleeting biogeochemical or ecological events without the shower thoughts produced by scientists' human sensory and cognitive systems during storms.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 441-452 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | BioScience |
| Volume | 73 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 1 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:©TheAuthor(s)2023.
Funding
JTVS and SGG acknowledge support from the US National Science Foundation (EAR-HS grant no. 1954538). ZCB's contributions were supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (through grant no. 2020–67014–30916). DPA's contributions were supported by the US Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (through grant no. 2019–67019–29906) and the McIntire Stennis project (grant no. 1023985), and was based on work supported by the Department of Energy to the University of Georgia Research Foundation (grant no. DE-EM0004391) and to the US Forest Service Savannah River (grant no. DE-EM0003622).
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Ear | |
| U.S. Department of Energy | |
| U.S. Forest Service–Savannah River | DE-EM0003622 |
| US Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Agriculture and Food Research Initiative | 2019–67019–29906, 1023985, 2020–67014–30916 |
| University of Georgia Research Foundation | DE-EM0004391 |
| National Science Foundation Arctic Social Science Program | 1954538 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
Keywords
- climate change
- condensation
- ecosystem functioning
- extreme event biogeochemistry
- field and laboratory studies
- precipitation
- sampling bias
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Shower thoughts: why scientists should spend more time in the rain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver