Abstract
Researchers studying eating disorders in men often use eating disorder risk and symptom measures that have been validated only on women. Using a sample of 215 college women and 214 college men, we report on the validity of doing so with a set of measures chosen to reflect a wide range of risk factors and symptoms. The Bulimia Test-revised (BULIT-R), the restraint scale (RS), the three-factor eating questionnaire (TFEQ), the Eating Expectancy Inventory, and the eating attitudes test (EAT) all had the same factor structures for both genders, and tests of invariance showed that factor loadings, factor variances, and intercorrelations among factors were equivalent across gender. A modified Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV anorexic symptoms questionnaire did not perform adequately for either gender. Men produced slightly less reliable scores on virtually all measures, with the result that Pearson-based estimates of correlations among the measures were slightly lower for men. Men had lower scores on symptom and risk measures, but not on other eating measures.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 209-222 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Eating Behaviors |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 2004 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Eating disorder
- Risk factors
- Symptom measures
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Similarities and differences between women and men on eating disorder risk factors and symptom measures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver