Size effects in finish machining of porous powdered metal for engineered surface quality

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Porous tungsten is conventionally machined with the aid of a plastic infiltrant to achieve acceptable surface finish. For dispenser cathode application, both high surface porosity and low surface roughness are necessary. Cryogenic machining has already been demonstrated to be capable of eliminating the need for plastic infiltration by greatly reducing smearing of pores. In order to address the problem of undesirable brittle fracture during cryogenic machining, the importance of uncut chip geometry is investigated. The value of critical chip thickness, beyond which brittle fracture occurs, is found to be closely linked to the microstructure of the workpiece material. While machining with very low uncut chip thickness leads to ploughing and spalling of the workpiece surface, ductile mode machining of porous tungsten with cryogenic cooling is found to yield excellent surface quality. When the maximum uncut chip thickness is approximately equal to the average ligament diameter of 80% density porous tungsten (d ≈ 8-9 μm), ductile mode machining is possible under both dry and cryogenic conditions. Changes in shock compaction behavior of the workpiece material, leading to altered physical properties, is hypothesized to be the underlying mechanism of ductile mode machining of porous tungsten.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)180-191
Number of pages12
JournalPrecision Engineering
Volume44
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Critical chip thickness
  • Cryogenic machining
  • Porous tungsten
  • Powder metal
  • Size effects
  • Surface integrity
  • Sustainable

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Size effects in finish machining of porous powdered metal for engineered surface quality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this