TY - JOUR
T1 - So far away from one's partner, yet so close to romantic alternatives
T2 - Avoidant attachment, interest in alternatives, and infidelity
AU - DeWall, C. Nathan
AU - Lambert, Nathaniel M.
AU - Slotter, Erica B.
AU - Pond, Richard S.
AU - Deckman, Timothy
AU - Finkel, Eli J.
AU - Luchies, Laura B.
AU - Fincham, Frank D.
PY - 2011/12
Y1 - 2011/12
N2 - Temptation pervades modern social life, including the temptation to engage in infidelity. The present investigation examines one factor that may put individuals at a greater risk of being unfaithful to their partner: dispositional avoidant attachment style. The authors hypothesize that avoidantly attached people may be less resistant to temptations for infidelity due to lower levels of commitment in romantic relationships. This hypothesis was confirmed in 8 studies. People with high, vs. low, levels of dispositional avoidant attachment had more permissive attitudes toward infidelity (Study 1), showed attentional bias toward attractive alternative partners (Study 2), expressed greater daily interest in meeting alternatives to their current relationship partner (Study 5), perceived alternatives to their current relationship partner more positively (Study 6), and engaged in more infidelity over time (Studies 3, 4, 7, and 8). This effect was mediated by lower levels of commitment (Studies 5-8). Thus, avoidant attachment predicted a broad spectrum of responses indicative of interest in alternatives and propensity to engage in infidelity, which were mediated by low levels of commitment.
AB - Temptation pervades modern social life, including the temptation to engage in infidelity. The present investigation examines one factor that may put individuals at a greater risk of being unfaithful to their partner: dispositional avoidant attachment style. The authors hypothesize that avoidantly attached people may be less resistant to temptations for infidelity due to lower levels of commitment in romantic relationships. This hypothesis was confirmed in 8 studies. People with high, vs. low, levels of dispositional avoidant attachment had more permissive attitudes toward infidelity (Study 1), showed attentional bias toward attractive alternative partners (Study 2), expressed greater daily interest in meeting alternatives to their current relationship partner (Study 5), perceived alternatives to their current relationship partner more positively (Study 6), and engaged in more infidelity over time (Studies 3, 4, 7, and 8). This effect was mediated by lower levels of commitment (Studies 5-8). Thus, avoidant attachment predicted a broad spectrum of responses indicative of interest in alternatives and propensity to engage in infidelity, which were mediated by low levels of commitment.
KW - Attachment style
KW - Avoidance
KW - Commitment
KW - Infidelity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82955196774&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=82955196774&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/a0025497
DO - 10.1037/a0025497
M3 - Article
C2 - 21967006
AN - SCOPUS:82955196774
SN - 0022-3514
VL - 101
SP - 1302
EP - 1316
JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
IS - 6
ER -