Social network research: Confusions, criticisms, and controversies

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

142 Scopus citations

Abstract

Is social network analysis just measures and methods with no theory? We attempt to clarify some confusions, address some previous critiques and controversies surrounding the issues of structure, human agency, endogeneity, tie content, network change, and context, and add a few critiques of our own. We use these issues as an opportunity to discuss the fundamental characteristics of network theory and to provide our thoughts on opportunities for future research in social network analysis.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationContemporary Perspectives on Organizational Social Networks
Pages1-29
Number of pages29
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Publication series

NameResearch in the Sociology of Organizations
Volume40
ISSN (Print)0733-558X

Keywords

  • Agency
  • Endogeneity
  • Network dynamics
  • Network theory
  • Structure
  • Tie content

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Social network research: Confusions, criticisms, and controversies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this