TY - JOUR
T1 - Soil electrical conductivity map variability in limestone soils overlain by loess
AU - Mueller, T. G.
AU - Hartsock, N. J.
AU - Stombaugh, T. S.
AU - Shearer, S. A.
AU - Cornelius, P. L.
AU - Barnhisel, R. I.
PY - 2003
Y1 - 2003
N2 - Sensors exist that allow rapid mapping of bulk soil electrical conductivity (EC); however, the utility of these sensors for Kentucky producers is unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess the nature and the causes of soil EC variability and to make a first assessment of its potential utility in Kentucky, particularly for fields containing soils derived from limestone residuum overlain by loess. Various geostatistical, correlation, and regression analyses were conducted at seven locations to examine EC map variability. Sensor drift and errors associated with changes in coulter depth were minimal. Bulk soil EC related fairly well with clay content across locations and sample dates (r2 = 0.40); however, many site- and time-specific correlations were better. Clay (maximum r2 = 0.75), moisture content (maximum r2 = 0.76), Ca (maximum r2 = 0.67), and Mg (maximum r2 = 0.64) were positively correlated with EC, and depth to argillic or cambic horizon (maximum r2 = 0.62), depth to fragipan (maximum r2 = 0.81), and depth to bedrock (maximum r2 = 0.32) were negatively correlated with EC. A multiple-regression model (R2 = 0.70) was developed to predict EC that included nine factors: clay, sand, soil moisture, buffer pH, base saturation, Ca, soil temperature, depth to cambic and argillic horizon, and slope. Soil EC variability was spatially structured, and spatial patterns were stable over time; however, the degree to which these patterns could be observed depended on the mapping procedures used. Our research suggested that EC mapping may have utility for Kentucky farmers.
AB - Sensors exist that allow rapid mapping of bulk soil electrical conductivity (EC); however, the utility of these sensors for Kentucky producers is unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess the nature and the causes of soil EC variability and to make a first assessment of its potential utility in Kentucky, particularly for fields containing soils derived from limestone residuum overlain by loess. Various geostatistical, correlation, and regression analyses were conducted at seven locations to examine EC map variability. Sensor drift and errors associated with changes in coulter depth were minimal. Bulk soil EC related fairly well with clay content across locations and sample dates (r2 = 0.40); however, many site- and time-specific correlations were better. Clay (maximum r2 = 0.75), moisture content (maximum r2 = 0.76), Ca (maximum r2 = 0.67), and Mg (maximum r2 = 0.64) were positively correlated with EC, and depth to argillic or cambic horizon (maximum r2 = 0.62), depth to fragipan (maximum r2 = 0.81), and depth to bedrock (maximum r2 = 0.32) were negatively correlated with EC. A multiple-regression model (R2 = 0.70) was developed to predict EC that included nine factors: clay, sand, soil moisture, buffer pH, base saturation, Ca, soil temperature, depth to cambic and argillic horizon, and slope. Soil EC variability was spatially structured, and spatial patterns were stable over time; however, the degree to which these patterns could be observed depended on the mapping procedures used. Our research suggested that EC mapping may have utility for Kentucky farmers.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038547946&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038547946&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2134/agronj2003.4960
DO - 10.2134/agronj2003.4960
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0038547946
SN - 0002-1962
VL - 95
SP - 496
EP - 507
JO - Agronomy Journal
JF - Agronomy Journal
IS - 3
ER -