TY - GEN
T1 - Soil management determines sampling density/spatial dependence of dynamic soil properties
AU - Grove, J. H.
AU - Pena-Yewtukhiw, E. M.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Sampling designs are needed to characterize spatial variation in 'dynamic' soil properties - those which change with time. The objectives were to: (1) identify spatial scales of dynamic soil properties; and (2) relate spatial structure to surface conservation practices. Twelve continuous and discontinuous no-tillage fields in the Choptank basin, Delmarva Peninsula, USA were sampled at 0-5 and 5-10 cm for soil organic matter (SOM) and at 0-5 cm for aggregate size distribution (mean weight diameter-MWD). Management influenced property magnitude and spatial dependence. MWD was greater with continuous no-till and spatial variation rose more quickly with increased sampling density than with discontinuous no-tillage. Discontinuous no-tillage captured 60% of MWD spatial variation at small scales (10 m sampling lag/100 m maximum distance); 12% was determined at the 50 m lag/500 m maximum distance and 6% was captured at 100 m lag/1000 m and 400 m lag/4,000 m. Continuous no-tillage increased MWD spatial dependence capture to 80% at the smallest scale, but no spatial variation was determined at larger scales. SOM was smaller with continuous no-till, but more SOM spatial variation was captured at the smallest scale with discontinuous no-tillage. Dynamic soil property sampling density and map resolution need to be accounted for when assessing model outcomes.
AB - Sampling designs are needed to characterize spatial variation in 'dynamic' soil properties - those which change with time. The objectives were to: (1) identify spatial scales of dynamic soil properties; and (2) relate spatial structure to surface conservation practices. Twelve continuous and discontinuous no-tillage fields in the Choptank basin, Delmarva Peninsula, USA were sampled at 0-5 and 5-10 cm for soil organic matter (SOM) and at 0-5 cm for aggregate size distribution (mean weight diameter-MWD). Management influenced property magnitude and spatial dependence. MWD was greater with continuous no-till and spatial variation rose more quickly with increased sampling density than with discontinuous no-tillage. Discontinuous no-tillage captured 60% of MWD spatial variation at small scales (10 m sampling lag/100 m maximum distance); 12% was determined at the 50 m lag/500 m maximum distance and 6% was captured at 100 m lag/1000 m and 400 m lag/4,000 m. Continuous no-tillage increased MWD spatial dependence capture to 80% at the smallest scale, but no spatial variation was determined at larger scales. SOM was smaller with continuous no-till, but more SOM spatial variation was captured at the smallest scale with discontinuous no-tillage. Dynamic soil property sampling density and map resolution need to be accounted for when assessing model outcomes.
KW - Dynamic soil properties
KW - Land use
KW - Scales
KW - Transects
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947268327&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947268327&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3920/978-90-8686-814-8_26
DO - 10.3920/978-90-8686-814-8_26
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84947268327
T3 - Precision Agriculture 2015 - Papers Presented at the 10th European Conference on Precision Agriculture, ECPA 2015
SP - 217
EP - 223
BT - Precision Agriculture 2015 - Papers Presented at the 10th European Conference on Precision Agriculture, ECPA 2015
A2 - Stafford, John V.
T2 - 10th European Conference on Precision Agriculture, ECPA 2015
Y2 - 12 July 2015 through 16 July 2015
ER -