TY - JOUR
T1 - Southern Region Produce Safety Alliance Grower Training
T2 - Using Pre- and Post-Training Knowledge Assessments to Understand Training Effectiveness
AU - Schneider, Keith R.
AU - Schroeder, Mari
AU - Gutierrez, Alan
AU - Kharel, Karuna
AU - Goodrich Schneider, Renée
AU - Harder, Amy
AU - Philyaw Perez, Amanda
AU - Woods, Kristin
AU - Dunn, Laurel L.
AU - Priyesh, Paul
AU - Gunter, Christopher
AU - Rogers, Elena
AU - Simmons, Chip
AU - Johnston, Lynette
AU - Carter, Chad
AU - Taylor, Thomas M.
AU - Castillo, Alejandro
AU - Anciso, Juan
AU - Masabni, Joseph
AU - Strawn, Laura K.
AU - Vallotton, Amber
AU - Stull, Katelynn
AU - O'Bannon, Taylor
AU - Danyluk, Michelle D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/5
Y1 - 2024/5
N2 - The Produce Safety Alliance (PSA) grower training was introduced in 2016 as the standardized curriculum to meet the training requirements of the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Food Safety Modernization Act's (FSMA) Produce Safety Rule (PSR). The PSR states that at least one supervisor or responsible party from each farm must have successfully completed this food safety training or one equivalent to the standardized curriculum, as recognized by the FDA. This study evaluated the effectiveness of PSA trainings conducted between 2017 and 2019 in the Southern United States by the Southern Regional Center for Food Safety Training, Outreach, and Technical Assistance by analyzing pre- and posttest assessments. Effectiveness was based on a 25-question knowledge assessment administered to participants before (n = 2494) and after (n = 2460) each training. The knowledge assessment indicated the overall effectiveness of the training, with average scores increasing significantly from pretest (15.9/25, 63.4%) to posttest (20.3/25, 81.3%) (P < 0.001). The greatest knowledge gains were seen in the Postharvest Handling and Sanitation, How to Develop a Farm Food Safety Plan, and Agricultural Water modules. Notably, these modules had lower posttest scores compared to the other modules, indicating that the amount of knowledge gained did not necessarily correspond with a sufficient understanding of the material. To ensure that participants understand all aspects of the PSR and best practices to minimize food safety risks, additional or advanced trainings may be needed. Additionally, the current testing instrument (pre-/posttest) used for PSA grower training, while validated, may not be optimal, thus alternative methods to assess the training effectiveness are likely needed.
AB - The Produce Safety Alliance (PSA) grower training was introduced in 2016 as the standardized curriculum to meet the training requirements of the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Food Safety Modernization Act's (FSMA) Produce Safety Rule (PSR). The PSR states that at least one supervisor or responsible party from each farm must have successfully completed this food safety training or one equivalent to the standardized curriculum, as recognized by the FDA. This study evaluated the effectiveness of PSA trainings conducted between 2017 and 2019 in the Southern United States by the Southern Regional Center for Food Safety Training, Outreach, and Technical Assistance by analyzing pre- and posttest assessments. Effectiveness was based on a 25-question knowledge assessment administered to participants before (n = 2494) and after (n = 2460) each training. The knowledge assessment indicated the overall effectiveness of the training, with average scores increasing significantly from pretest (15.9/25, 63.4%) to posttest (20.3/25, 81.3%) (P < 0.001). The greatest knowledge gains were seen in the Postharvest Handling and Sanitation, How to Develop a Farm Food Safety Plan, and Agricultural Water modules. Notably, these modules had lower posttest scores compared to the other modules, indicating that the amount of knowledge gained did not necessarily correspond with a sufficient understanding of the material. To ensure that participants understand all aspects of the PSR and best practices to minimize food safety risks, additional or advanced trainings may be needed. Additionally, the current testing instrument (pre-/posttest) used for PSA grower training, while validated, may not be optimal, thus alternative methods to assess the training effectiveness are likely needed.
KW - Assessment
KW - Knowledge
KW - Produce Safety Alliance Training
KW - Produce Safety Rule
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85189515113&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85189515113&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100266
DO - 10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100266
M3 - Article
C2 - 38493874
AN - SCOPUS:85189515113
SN - 0362-028X
VL - 87
JO - Journal of Food Protection
JF - Journal of Food Protection
IS - 5
M1 - 100266
ER -