TY - JOUR
T1 - Spatial, temporal and relational patterns in respondent-driven sampling
T2 - Evidence from a social network study of rural drug users
AU - Young, April M.
AU - Rudolph, Abby E.
AU - Quillen, Deane
AU - Havens, Jennifer R.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Background Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) has become a common tool for recruiting high-risk populations for HIV research. However, few studies have explored the influence of geospatial proximity and relationship-level characteristics on RDS recruitment, particularly among high-risk individuals residing in rural areas of the US. Methods In a social network study of 503 drug users in rural Central Appalachia, interviewer-administered questionnaires were used to collect relationship-level data (eg, duration of relationship, frequency of communication, kinship, social/financial support, trust, drug use and sex) and residential location. Demographic and drug-se similarity were also evaluated. Residential data were geocoded and road distance (km) between participants and (1) their network members and (2) the study site were computed. Seasonal patterns were assessed using node-level analysis, and dyadic analyses were conducted using generalised linear mixed models. Adjusted ORs (AORs) and 95% CIs are reported. Results Differences in distance to the study office by season and order of study entry were not observed (F=1.49, p=0.209 and ß=0.074, p=0.050, respectively). Participants with transportation lived significantly further from the interview site than their counterparts (p<0.001). Dyadic analyses revealed no association between RDS recruitment likelihood and geographic proximity. However, kinship (AOR 1.62; CI 1.02 to 2.58) and frequency of communication (AOR 1.63; CI 1.25 to 2.13) were significantly associated with RDS recruitment. Conclusions In this sample, recruitment from one's network was likely non-random, contradicting a core RDS assumption. These data underscore the importance of formative research to elucidate potential recruitment preferences and of quantifying recruitment preferences for use in analysis.
AB - Background Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) has become a common tool for recruiting high-risk populations for HIV research. However, few studies have explored the influence of geospatial proximity and relationship-level characteristics on RDS recruitment, particularly among high-risk individuals residing in rural areas of the US. Methods In a social network study of 503 drug users in rural Central Appalachia, interviewer-administered questionnaires were used to collect relationship-level data (eg, duration of relationship, frequency of communication, kinship, social/financial support, trust, drug use and sex) and residential location. Demographic and drug-se similarity were also evaluated. Residential data were geocoded and road distance (km) between participants and (1) their network members and (2) the study site were computed. Seasonal patterns were assessed using node-level analysis, and dyadic analyses were conducted using generalised linear mixed models. Adjusted ORs (AORs) and 95% CIs are reported. Results Differences in distance to the study office by season and order of study entry were not observed (F=1.49, p=0.209 and ß=0.074, p=0.050, respectively). Participants with transportation lived significantly further from the interview site than their counterparts (p<0.001). Dyadic analyses revealed no association between RDS recruitment likelihood and geographic proximity. However, kinship (AOR 1.62; CI 1.02 to 2.58) and frequency of communication (AOR 1.63; CI 1.25 to 2.13) were significantly associated with RDS recruitment. Conclusions In this sample, recruitment from one's network was likely non-random, contradicting a core RDS assumption. These data underscore the importance of formative research to elucidate potential recruitment preferences and of quantifying recruitment preferences for use in analysis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904317340&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904317340&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/jech-2014-203935
DO - 10.1136/jech-2014-203935
M3 - Article
C2 - 24692631
AN - SCOPUS:84904317340
SN - 0143-005X
VL - 68
SP - 792
EP - 798
JO - Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
JF - Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
IS - 8
ER -