Sugar or spice: Using I3 metatheory to understand how and why glucose reduces rejection-related aggression

Michaela Pfundmair, C. Nathan Dewall, Veronika Fries, Babette Geiger, Tanya Krämer, Sebastian Krug, Dieter Frey, Nilüfer Aydin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

Social rejection can increase aggression, especially among people high in rejection sensitivity. Rejection impairs self-control, and deficits in self-control often result in aggression. A dose of glucose can counteract the effect of situational factors that undermine self-control. But no research has integrated these literatures to understand why rejection increases aggression, and how to reduce it. Using the I3 model of aggression, we proposed that aggression would be highest under conditions of high instigation (rejection), high impellance (high rejection sensitivity), and low inhibition (drinking a beverage sweetened with a sugar substitute instead of glucose). As predicted, aggression was highest among participants who experienced social rejection, were high in rejection sensitivity, and drank a placebo beverage. A dose of glucose reduced aggression, especially among rejected people high in rejection sensitivity. These findings point to the importance of self-control in understanding why social rejection increases aggression, and how to prevent it. Aggr. Behav. 41:537-543, 2015.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)537-543
Number of pages7
JournalAggressive Behavior
Volume41
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords

  • Aggression
  • Glucose
  • I model
  • Rejection
  • Self-control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • General Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sugar or spice: Using I3 metatheory to understand how and why glucose reduces rejection-related aggression'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this