TY - JOUR
T1 - Surgical methodology and protocols for preventing implanted cerebral catheters from becoming obstructed during and after neurosurgery
AU - E Quintero, Jorge
AU - Zhang, Rui
AU - Pang, Qi
AU - Xing, Yi
AU - Hardy, Peter
AU - Fan, Xiaotong
AU - Ai, Yi
AU - Gash, Don M.
AU - A Gerhardt, Greg
AU - Grondin, Richard
AU - Zhang, Zhiming
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2021/2/1
Y1 - 2021/2/1
N2 - Background: Convection Enhanced Delivery (CED) into targeted brain areas has been tested in animal models and clinical trials for the treatment of various neurological diseases. New method: We used a series of techniques, to in effect, maintain positive pressure inside the catheter relative to the outside, that included a hollow stylet, a high volume bolus of solution to clear the line, a low and slow continuous flow rate during implantation, and heat sealing the catheter at the time of implantation. Results: 120 catheters implanted into brain parenchyma of 89 adult female rhesus monkeys across four sets of experiments. After experiencing a high delivery failure rate – non patent catheters – (19 %) because of tissue entrapment and debris and/or blood clots in the catheter tip, we developed modifications, including increasing the bolus infusion volume from 10 to 20 μl such that by the third experiment, the failure rate was 8 % (1 of 12 implants). Increasing the bolus volume to 100 μl and maintaining positive pressure in the catheter during preparation and implantation yielded a failure rate of 0 % (0/12 implants) by the fourth experiment. Comparison with existing methods: We provide a retrospective analysis to reveal how several different manipulations affect catheter patency and how post-op MRI examination is essential for assessing catheter patency in situ. Conclusions: The results of the present study identified that the main cause of the catheter blockages were clots that rendered the catheter non-patent. We resolved this by modifying the surgical procedures that prevented these clots from forming.
AB - Background: Convection Enhanced Delivery (CED) into targeted brain areas has been tested in animal models and clinical trials for the treatment of various neurological diseases. New method: We used a series of techniques, to in effect, maintain positive pressure inside the catheter relative to the outside, that included a hollow stylet, a high volume bolus of solution to clear the line, a low and slow continuous flow rate during implantation, and heat sealing the catheter at the time of implantation. Results: 120 catheters implanted into brain parenchyma of 89 adult female rhesus monkeys across four sets of experiments. After experiencing a high delivery failure rate – non patent catheters – (19 %) because of tissue entrapment and debris and/or blood clots in the catheter tip, we developed modifications, including increasing the bolus infusion volume from 10 to 20 μl such that by the third experiment, the failure rate was 8 % (1 of 12 implants). Increasing the bolus volume to 100 μl and maintaining positive pressure in the catheter during preparation and implantation yielded a failure rate of 0 % (0/12 implants) by the fourth experiment. Comparison with existing methods: We provide a retrospective analysis to reveal how several different manipulations affect catheter patency and how post-op MRI examination is essential for assessing catheter patency in situ. Conclusions: The results of the present study identified that the main cause of the catheter blockages were clots that rendered the catheter non-patent. We resolved this by modifying the surgical procedures that prevented these clots from forming.
KW - Aspirating stylet
KW - Convection enhanced delivery
KW - Magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Rhesus macaques
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097782387&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85097782387&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.109020
DO - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.109020
M3 - Article
C2 - 33285151
AN - SCOPUS:85097782387
SN - 0165-0270
VL - 349
JO - Journal of Neuroscience Methods
JF - Journal of Neuroscience Methods
M1 - 109020
ER -