TY - JOUR
T1 - Surgical resection of primary and metastatic hepatic malignancies following portal vein embolization
AU - Mailey, Brian
AU - Truong, Caitlyn
AU - Artinyan, Avo
AU - Khalili, Joshua
AU - Sanchez-Luege, Nicelio
AU - Denitz, Jordan
AU - Marx, Howard
AU - Wagman, Lawrence D.
AU - Kim, Joseph
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Background: Portal vein embolization (PVE) has been used to induce hypertrophy in future liver remnants (FLRs) in preparation for major hepatic resection. We report our initial experience with PVE and identify potential predictors of unresectability following PVE. Methods: Patients with primary and metastatic hepatic malignancies (n = 20) who underwent PVE between 2004 and 2008 were categorized by surgical resection status and clinicopathologic factors were compared. Results: The cohort had the following histologies: colorectal adenocarcinoma (45%, n = 9), hepatocellular carcinoma (20%), cholangiocarcinoma (20%), and other (15%). Seven patients (35%) had previous liver-directed or regional therapy; 55% subsequently underwent successful liver resection, whereas 45% were deemed unresectable. Patients who underwent successful resection had tumor shrinkage after PVE compared to unresectable patients (% change in maximal tumor diameter, -6% vs. +45%, respectively; P = 0.027) and had a lower rate of baseline liver function test abnormality (0% vs. 56%, respectively; P = 0.004). Resected patients had an 83% 5-year overall survival. Conclusions: Baseline liver dysfunction may predict subsequent unresectable hepatic disease following PVE and tumor progression after PVE appears to increase the likelihood for finding unresectable hepatic disease. Select patients should be considered for PVE with careful surveillance during the period of FLR hypertrophy.
AB - Background: Portal vein embolization (PVE) has been used to induce hypertrophy in future liver remnants (FLRs) in preparation for major hepatic resection. We report our initial experience with PVE and identify potential predictors of unresectability following PVE. Methods: Patients with primary and metastatic hepatic malignancies (n = 20) who underwent PVE between 2004 and 2008 were categorized by surgical resection status and clinicopathologic factors were compared. Results: The cohort had the following histologies: colorectal adenocarcinoma (45%, n = 9), hepatocellular carcinoma (20%), cholangiocarcinoma (20%), and other (15%). Seven patients (35%) had previous liver-directed or regional therapy; 55% subsequently underwent successful liver resection, whereas 45% were deemed unresectable. Patients who underwent successful resection had tumor shrinkage after PVE compared to unresectable patients (% change in maximal tumor diameter, -6% vs. +45%, respectively; P = 0.027) and had a lower rate of baseline liver function test abnormality (0% vs. 56%, respectively; P = 0.004). Resected patients had an 83% 5-year overall survival. Conclusions: Baseline liver dysfunction may predict subsequent unresectable hepatic disease following PVE and tumor progression after PVE appears to increase the likelihood for finding unresectable hepatic disease. Select patients should be considered for PVE with careful surveillance during the period of FLR hypertrophy.
KW - Hepatic malignancies
KW - Portal vein embolization
KW - Surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70249138364&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70249138364&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jso.21343
DO - 10.1002/jso.21343
M3 - Article
C2 - 19572328
AN - SCOPUS:70249138364
SN - 0022-4790
VL - 100
SP - 184
EP - 190
JO - Journal of Surgical Oncology
JF - Journal of Surgical Oncology
IS - 3
ER -