Temporal relationship between positive margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and surgical training

Jay B. Page, Daniel L. Davenport, Raman Unnikrishnan, Paul L. Crispen, Ramakrishna Venkatesh, Stephen E. Strup

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the potential impact of the experience of the first assistant on the positive surgical margin rate (PSMR) after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). The impact of training surgical residents and fellows on patient outcomes is difficult to quantify. Methods A single-institution prospective database of 303 patients who underwent LRP between 2003 and 2008 was evaluated. The potential impact of the experience of the first assistant on the PSMR was evaluated by examining the relationship between the PSMR and the time of the academic year. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for patient age, Gleason's sum, tumor density, and pathologic stage. Results Overall positive margin rate was 18.2%. Positive margin rate for July and August (14/45, 31.1%) was significantly higher than for the remaining 10 months (41/258, 15.9%) P = .015. The increased risk of positive margin in July/August remained significant after adjusting for age, Gleason's sum, tumor density, and pathologic stage (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.215.79, P = .015) Conclusions LRP performed with the first assistant in the first 2 months of the academic training year have a significantly higher PSMR.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)626-630
Number of pages5
JournalUrology
Volume77
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2011

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Temporal relationship between positive margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and surgical training'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this