TY - JOUR
T1 - Temporomandibular joint sound evaluation with an electronic device and clinical evaluation
AU - Tanzilli, R. A.
AU - Tallents, R. H.
AU - Katzberg, R. W.
AU - Kyrkanides, S.
AU - Moss, M. E.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - Sound analysis to diagnose internal derangement has received much attention as an alternative to radiographic examination. The purpose of this study was to compare findings with an electronic device (sonography) and clinical examination to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Twenty-three symptomatic patients (46 joints) were evaluated for this study. All patients had jaw joint pain and one or more of the following findings; limitation of jaw opening, painful mandibular movement with or without clicking or crepitation. The presence or absence of joint sounds was evaluated clinically by palpation and auscultation and with sonography. If sounds were present (clicking or crepitation) on either examination the patient was considered positive for disc displacement for that examination. Two by two tables were constructed comparing sonography and clinical examination with MRI findings. The sensitivity of the sonogram was 84% and the specificity was 33% when compared with MRI findings. The sensitivity of the clinical examination was 70% and the specificity was 40% when compared with MRI findings. This study suggests that clinical and sonographic examination has a high sensitivity (low false negative examinations) but low specificity (high false positive examinations).
AB - Sound analysis to diagnose internal derangement has received much attention as an alternative to radiographic examination. The purpose of this study was to compare findings with an electronic device (sonography) and clinical examination to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Twenty-three symptomatic patients (46 joints) were evaluated for this study. All patients had jaw joint pain and one or more of the following findings; limitation of jaw opening, painful mandibular movement with or without clicking or crepitation. The presence or absence of joint sounds was evaluated clinically by palpation and auscultation and with sonography. If sounds were present (clicking or crepitation) on either examination the patient was considered positive for disc displacement for that examination. Two by two tables were constructed comparing sonography and clinical examination with MRI findings. The sensitivity of the sonogram was 84% and the specificity was 33% when compared with MRI findings. The sensitivity of the clinical examination was 70% and the specificity was 40% when compared with MRI findings. This study suggests that clinical and sonographic examination has a high sensitivity (low false negative examinations) but low specificity (high false positive examinations).
KW - Comparative study
KW - Electronic devices
KW - Joint sounds
KW - Magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Temporomandibular joint disorders
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33747890360&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33747890360&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1034/j.1600-0544.2001.040203.x
DO - 10.1034/j.1600-0544.2001.040203.x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:33747890360
SN - 1601-6335
VL - 4
SP - 72
EP - 78
JO - Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research
JF - Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research
IS - 2
ER -