Abstract
Using content analysis of newspaper coverage of the discovery of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in the United States, we analyze the media's portrayal of the "BSE crisis," from a social constructionist perspective. We identify the salient claims-makers in the dialogue over food safety as it pertains to the discovery of BSE and we examine the content of their claims to reveal their core messages. We find that public definitions and responses to the disease are influenced by claims-makers and claims-making activities. Some actors construct claims of confidence to deny the severity of the disease, while others construct and disseminate claims of risk in the beef commodity chain, while still others diffuse claims of skepticism and uncertainty. These findings offer support for understanding claims-making as shaped by contextual forces. Claims are not made in a vacuum but are given meaning based upon biophysical and socio-cultural contexts.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 95-115 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Illness Crisis and Loss |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2005 |
Keywords
- Agrifood
- BSE
- Bovine spongiform encephalopathy
- Claims-making
- Food safety
- Mad cow disease
- Moral panic
- Social construction
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health(social science)
- Sociology and Political Science