TY - JOUR
T1 - The association of hospital volume with rectal cancer surgery outcomes
AU - Baek, Jeong Heum
AU - Alrubaie, Abdulhadi
AU - Guzman, Eduardo A.
AU - Choi, Sun Keun
AU - Anderson, Casandra
AU - Mills, Steven
AU - Carmichael, Joseph
AU - Dagis, Andy
AU - Qian, Dajun
AU - Kim, Joseph
AU - Garcia-Aguilar, Julio
AU - Stamos, Michael J.
AU - Bening, Lisa
AU - Pigazzi, Alessio
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2013/2
Y1 - 2013/2
N2 - Purpose: An association between hospital volume and postoperative mortality has been identified for several oncologic surgical procedures. Our objective was to analyze differences in surgical outcomes for patients with rectal cancer according to hospital volume in the state of California. Methods: A cross-sectional study from 2000 to 2005 was performed using the state of California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development database. Hospitals were categorized into low (≤30)-, medium (31-60)-, and high (>60)-volume groups based on the total number of rectal cancer operations performed during the study period. Results: Overall, 7,187 rectal cancer operations were performed. Of the 321 hospitals in the study cohort, 72 % (n = 232), 20 % (n = 65), and 8 % (n = 24) were low-, medium-, and high-volume hospitals, respectively. Postoperative mortality was significantly lower- in high-volume hospitals (0.9 %) when compared to medium- (1.1 %) and low-volume hospitals (2.1 %; p < 0.001). High-volume hospitals also performed more sphincter-preserving procedures (64 %) when compared to medium- (55 %) and low-volume hospitals (51 %; p < 0.001). Conclusions: These data indicate that hospital volume correlates with improved outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. Rectal cancer patients may benefit from lower mortality and increased sphincter preservation in higher-volume centers.
AB - Purpose: An association between hospital volume and postoperative mortality has been identified for several oncologic surgical procedures. Our objective was to analyze differences in surgical outcomes for patients with rectal cancer according to hospital volume in the state of California. Methods: A cross-sectional study from 2000 to 2005 was performed using the state of California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development database. Hospitals were categorized into low (≤30)-, medium (31-60)-, and high (>60)-volume groups based on the total number of rectal cancer operations performed during the study period. Results: Overall, 7,187 rectal cancer operations were performed. Of the 321 hospitals in the study cohort, 72 % (n = 232), 20 % (n = 65), and 8 % (n = 24) were low-, medium-, and high-volume hospitals, respectively. Postoperative mortality was significantly lower- in high-volume hospitals (0.9 %) when compared to medium- (1.1 %) and low-volume hospitals (2.1 %; p < 0.001). High-volume hospitals also performed more sphincter-preserving procedures (64 %) when compared to medium- (55 %) and low-volume hospitals (51 %; p < 0.001). Conclusions: These data indicate that hospital volume correlates with improved outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. Rectal cancer patients may benefit from lower mortality and increased sphincter preservation in higher-volume centers.
KW - Mortality
KW - OSHPD
KW - Rectal cancer
KW - Surgical outcomes
KW - Volume
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879503052&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879503052&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00384-012-1536-1
DO - 10.1007/s00384-012-1536-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 22842664
AN - SCOPUS:84879503052
SN - 0179-1958
VL - 28
SP - 191
EP - 196
JO - International Journal of Colorectal Disease
JF - International Journal of Colorectal Disease
IS - 2
ER -