The believability of repressed memories

Jonathan M. Golding, Sandra A. Sego, Rebecca Polley Sanchez, Dawn Hasemann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

52 Scopus citations

Abstract

Two experiments investigated how mock jurors react to a case involving a repressed memory of child sexual assault. Subjects read a fictional civil trial (Experiment 1) or criminal trial (Experiment 2) summary involving the sexual assault of a 6-year-old female. The summary was presented in one of three conditions: (a)child condition: the alleged victim reported her memory of the assault in the same year that the assault occurred; (b)repressed condition: the alleged victim reported the assault 20 years later, after remembering it for the first time; or (c)no-repressed condition: the alleged victim reported the assault 20 years later, but the memory of the assault had been present for the 20 years. Although the testimony of the alleged victim was believed to some extent in all conditions, the alleged victim in the child condition was believed at the highest level, and this was associated with more decisions against the defendant. The results are discussed in terms of how delayed reporting of child sexual assault crimes is associated with lower believability of the alleged victim.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)569-592
Number of pages24
JournalLaw and Human Behavior
Volume19
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1995

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology (all)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The believability of repressed memories'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this