The Brief Aggression Questionnaire: Structure, Validity, Reliability, and Generalizability

Gregory D. Webster; C. Nathan DeWall; Richard S. Pond; Timothy Deckman; Peter K. Jonason; Bonnie M. Le; Austin Lee Nichols; Tatiana Orozco Schember; Laura C. Crysel; Benjamin S. Crosier; C. Veronica Smith; E. Layne Paddock; John B. Nezlek; Lee A. Kirkpatrick; Angela D. Bryan; Renée J. Bator

doi:10.1080/00223891.2015.1044093

The Brief Aggression Questionnaire: Structure, Validity, Reliability, and Generalizability

Gregory D. Webster, C. Nathan DeWall, Richard S. Pond, Timothy Deckman, Peter K. Jonason, Bonnie M. Le, Austin Lee Nichols, Tatiana Orozco Schember, Laura C. Crysel, Benjamin S. Crosier, C. Veronica Smith, E. Layne Paddock, John B. Nezlek, Lee A. Kirkpatrick, Angela D. Bryan, Renée J. Bator

Psychology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

47 Scopus citations

Abstract

In contexts that increasingly demand brief self-report measures (e.g., experience sampling, longitudinal and field studies), researchers seek succinct surveys that maintain reliability and validity. One such measure is the 12-item Brief Aggression Questionnaire (BAQ; Webster et al., 2014), which uses 4 3-item subscales: Physical Aggression, Verbal Aggression, Anger, and Hostility. Although prior work suggests the BAQ's scores are reliable and valid, we addressed some lingering concerns. Across 3 studies (N = 1,279), we found that the BAQ had a 4-factor structure, possessed long-term test-retest reliability across 12 weeks, predicted differences in behavioral aggression over time in a laboratory experiment, generalized to a diverse nonstudent sample, and showed convergent validity with a displaced aggression measure. In addition, the BAQ's 3-item Anger subscale showed convergent validity with a trait anger measure. We discuss the BAQ's potential reliability, validity, limitations, and uses as an efficient measure of aggressive traits.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	638-649
Number of pages	12
Journal	Journal of Personality Assessment
Volume	97
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1044093
State	Published - Nov 2 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Clinical Psychology
Psychiatry and Mental health
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1080/00223891.2015.1044093

Cite this

Webster, G. D., DeWall, C. N., Pond, R. S., Deckman, T., Jonason, P. K., Le, B. M., Nichols, A. L., Schember, T. O., Crysel, L. C., Crosier, B. S., Smith, C. V., Paddock, E. L., Nezlek, J. B., Kirkpatrick, L. A., Bryan, A. D., & Bator, R. J. (2015). The Brief Aggression Questionnaire: Structure, Validity, Reliability, and Generalizability. Journal of Personality Assessment, 97(6), 638-649. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1044093

@article{1f0d3b3fbc9742e29e16b10760c551fa,

title = "The Brief Aggression Questionnaire: Structure, Validity, Reliability, and Generalizability",

abstract = "In contexts that increasingly demand brief self-report measures (e.g., experience sampling, longitudinal and field studies), researchers seek succinct surveys that maintain reliability and validity. One such measure is the 12-item Brief Aggression Questionnaire (BAQ; Webster et al., 2014), which uses 4 3-item subscales: Physical Aggression, Verbal Aggression, Anger, and Hostility. Although prior work suggests the BAQ's scores are reliable and valid, we addressed some lingering concerns. Across 3 studies (N = 1,279), we found that the BAQ had a 4-factor structure, possessed long-term test-retest reliability across 12 weeks, predicted differences in behavioral aggression over time in a laboratory experiment, generalized to a diverse nonstudent sample, and showed convergent validity with a displaced aggression measure. In addition, the BAQ's 3-item Anger subscale showed convergent validity with a trait anger measure. We discuss the BAQ's potential reliability, validity, limitations, and uses as an efficient measure of aggressive traits.",

author = "Webster, {Gregory D.} and DeWall, {C. Nathan} and Pond, {Richard S.} and Timothy Deckman and Jonason, {Peter K.} and Le, {Bonnie M.} and Nichols, {Austin Lee} and Schember, {Tatiana Orozco} and Crysel, {Laura C.} and Crosier, {Benjamin S.} and Smith, {C. Veronica} and Paddock, {E. Layne} and Nezlek, {John B.} and Kirkpatrick, {Lee A.} and Bryan, {Angela D.} and Bator, {Ren{\'e}e J.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: Copyright {\textcopyright} Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.",

year = "2015",

month = nov,

day = "2",

doi = "10.1080/00223891.2015.1044093",

language = "English",

volume = "97",

pages = "638--649",

number = "6",

}

Webster, GD, DeWall, CN, Pond, RS, Deckman, T, Jonason, PK, Le, BM, Nichols, AL, Schember, TO, Crysel, LC, Crosier, BS, Smith, CV, Paddock, EL, Nezlek, JB, Kirkpatrick, LA, Bryan, AD & Bator, RJ 2015, 'The Brief Aggression Questionnaire: Structure, Validity, Reliability, and Generalizability', Journal of Personality Assessment, vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 638-649. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1044093

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Brief Aggression Questionnaire

T2 - Structure, Validity, Reliability, and Generalizability

AU - Webster, Gregory D.

AU - DeWall, C. Nathan

AU - Pond, Richard S.

AU - Deckman, Timothy

AU - Jonason, Peter K.

AU - Le, Bonnie M.

AU - Nichols, Austin Lee

AU - Schember, Tatiana Orozco

AU - Crysel, Laura C.

AU - Crosier, Benjamin S.

AU - Smith, C. Veronica

AU - Paddock, E. Layne

AU - Nezlek, John B.

AU - Kirkpatrick, Lee A.

AU - Bryan, Angela D.

AU - Bator, Renée J.

PY - 2015/11/2

Y1 - 2015/11/2

N2 - In contexts that increasingly demand brief self-report measures (e.g., experience sampling, longitudinal and field studies), researchers seek succinct surveys that maintain reliability and validity. One such measure is the 12-item Brief Aggression Questionnaire (BAQ; Webster et al., 2014), which uses 4 3-item subscales: Physical Aggression, Verbal Aggression, Anger, and Hostility. Although prior work suggests the BAQ's scores are reliable and valid, we addressed some lingering concerns. Across 3 studies (N = 1,279), we found that the BAQ had a 4-factor structure, possessed long-term test-retest reliability across 12 weeks, predicted differences in behavioral aggression over time in a laboratory experiment, generalized to a diverse nonstudent sample, and showed convergent validity with a displaced aggression measure. In addition, the BAQ's 3-item Anger subscale showed convergent validity with a trait anger measure. We discuss the BAQ's potential reliability, validity, limitations, and uses as an efficient measure of aggressive traits.

AB - In contexts that increasingly demand brief self-report measures (e.g., experience sampling, longitudinal and field studies), researchers seek succinct surveys that maintain reliability and validity. One such measure is the 12-item Brief Aggression Questionnaire (BAQ; Webster et al., 2014), which uses 4 3-item subscales: Physical Aggression, Verbal Aggression, Anger, and Hostility. Although prior work suggests the BAQ's scores are reliable and valid, we addressed some lingering concerns. Across 3 studies (N = 1,279), we found that the BAQ had a 4-factor structure, possessed long-term test-retest reliability across 12 weeks, predicted differences in behavioral aggression over time in a laboratory experiment, generalized to a diverse nonstudent sample, and showed convergent validity with a displaced aggression measure. In addition, the BAQ's 3-item Anger subscale showed convergent validity with a trait anger measure. We discuss the BAQ's potential reliability, validity, limitations, and uses as an efficient measure of aggressive traits.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945437768&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945437768&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00223891.2015.1044093

DO - 10.1080/00223891.2015.1044093

M3 - Article

C2 - 26055531

AN - SCOPUS:84945437768

SN - 0022-3891

VL - 97

SP - 638

EP - 649

JO - Journal of Personality Assessment

JF - Journal of Personality Assessment

IS - 6

ER -

The Brief Aggression Questionnaire: Structure, Validity, Reliability, and Generalizability

Abstract

Bibliographical note

ASJC Scopus subject areas

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this