Abstract
Instructional communication scholars have long been interested in creating and testing alternative approaches to measuring cognitive learning. One of the existing measures, the Cognitive Learning Measure (Frisby & Martin, 2010), has not yet been fully validated. This series of three studies examined the factorial and concurrent validity of the scale. Results revealed that a three-factor measurement model was a better fit to the data than the original unidimensional factor model. Concurrent validity was established with respect to student motives, affective learning, student interest, classroom participation, and out-of-class communication with their instructors. The measure is discussed as a viable option for both operationalization of cognitive learning and as a complement to other learning tests.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 163-176 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Communication Methods and Measures |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 2014 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Communication
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Cognitive Learning Measure: A Three-Study Examination of Validity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver